IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjme/v03y2005i1p53-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

India as Top Producer of Tea in the World—Some Observations

Author

Listed:
  • L Krishna Veni

Abstract

India is the world’s leading commercial producer of tea. It is popular not only as a stimulating health drink, but also as a foreign exchange earner for India. The product variations of tea consist of green tea, packet tea, tea bags or cans, instant tea and flavored tea in India. Though both North and South India are engaged in tea production, North India has been the major producing region, contributing to more than 75% of the total production. The export-production ratio of Indian tea recorded a gradual decline, whereas the domestic consumption and production ratio of Indian tea demonstrated an upward movement during the study period. This study demonstrates the negative relationship between production of tea and exports of tea from India during 1950 to 1998. This study also brings out the exciting fact that the production of tea is largely confined to South Asian and African countries which are all developing countries and about 90% of their production is consumed in the developed countries. Further, this study highlights that India and Sri Lanka are the leading countries and Indonesia, East Africa and Latin America are the minors in the tea production. The country concentration index indicated the highly fluctuating trend in the production of tea in the world. It is evident from the study that the country concentration index of tea is less than 40% since 1986 due to the entry of the East African countries into tea production. Finally this study recommends that the increase in the level of tea production, adopting fine plucking to maintain good quality, and introduction of innovative tea products are very crucial to maintain the supremacy of India as the top producer of tea in the world.

Suggested Citation

  • L Krishna Veni, 2005. "India as Top Producer of Tea in the World—Some Observations," The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 53-65, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjme:v:03:y:2005:i:1:p:53-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjme:v:03:y:2005:i:1:p:53-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.