IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjkm/v10y2012i1p26-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communities of Practice: An Influencing Factor for Effective Knowledge Transfer in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • R Krishnaveni
  • R Sujatha

Abstract

For managing their intellectual capital and also to utilize the ‘knowledge’ more efficiently, a number of organizations have introduced Knowledge Management (KM) systems. Though explicit knowledge capture and transfer was quite possible, tacit knowledge was still a challenge for organization experts to capture and transfer. The concept of Communities of Practice (CoP) in KM is increasingly becoming popular to enhance social interactions. CoP refers to informal groups of people bound together by a common purpose. In these communities, members are provided opportunity to share their best practices, which are commonly implicit in nature. However, knowledge sharing in CoP has not been fully researched yet. The purpose of this paper is to review the relationship between KM and CoP and examine how it can influence the knowledge-sharing process in organizations. This study proposes a critical reading of the studies available on the topic, with the purpose to identify the main elements and methods influencing the transfer of knowledge. It reviews the emerging concept of ‘CoP’ as a knowledge transfer method for sharing knowledge which is commonly implicit in nature. This paper presents that the concept of CoP can foster joint learning that involves tacit and codified knowledge. Members of a CoP share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly. The existence of common knowledge and a shared system of values makes sharing tacit knowledge easier in CoP, as group members have insights into the implicit assumptions and values embedded in each other’s knowledge. An empirical work in managing CoP and in identifying the knowledge-sharing methods represents an interesting challenge for further research in the area.

Suggested Citation

  • R Krishnaveni & R Sujatha, 2012. "Communities of Practice: An Influencing Factor for Effective Knowledge Transfer in Organizations," The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 26-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjkm:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:26-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Kęstutis Vileikis, 2016. "Evaluation of Factors Determining the Efficiency of Knowledge Sharing Process in the Lithuanian National Defence System," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(4), pages 842-857, December.
    2. Regycleia B. C. Alves & Paulo Pinheiro, 2022. "Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Research Groups in Higher Education Institutions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Dirk Basten & Thilo Haamann, 2018. "Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(3), pages 21582440187, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjkm:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:26-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.