IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjgp/v02y2007i2p19-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affirmative Action Vs. Reservations In The Private Sector: The United States And India

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore P. Wright, Jr.

Abstract

Some opponents of extension of “reservations” in India have voiced a preference for what in the United States is called “Affirmative Action”. Historical differences in the two societies, one originating in slavery, the other in castes, explain some of the varied policy preferences. Americans tend to oppose quotas because they were used to exclude Jews in the past. Quotas are rooted in Indian colonial and post-colonial experience. The Gandhian era of the Indian National Movement and American experience in fighting fascism and later communism reduced the resistance of their respective majorities (Hindu and white Christian) to give benefits to the minorities. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 marked a crucial shift from the negative policy of outlawing discrimination to a positive one of actively increasing minority participation in education and employment in America. Some American businessmen actually aided affirmative action because it lowered wages by increasing the pool of eligible qualified recruits. Affirmative action applied in the United States to both public and private employment from the beginning, while in India it provided quotas only in the public sector until 2006 because of its importance in a semi-socialised economy until 1991. Another reason is the relatively large size of the informal sector in India, to which quotas would not apply. Both countries have experienced an expansion of various eligible categories, which has stiffened resistance by those who are ascriptively not eligible. “Compassion fatigue” has set in both countries which leads to electoral pressures to undo or terminate both kinds of programmes. Opponents point out the injustice of continuing the benefits to the “creamy layer” of the generally disadvantaged groups. Long duration of such programmes also arouses opposition as they become a vested interest. Since it is a less blatant “zero-sum-game”, affirmative action is more likely to persist and produce the desired results.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore P. Wright, Jr., 2007. "Affirmative Action Vs. Reservations In The Private Sector: The United States And India," The IUP Journal of Governance and Public Policy, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 19-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjgp:v:02:y:2007:i:2:p:19-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjgp:v:02:y:2007:i:2:p:19-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.