IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjfe/v09y2011i4p60-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Political Regime and Economic Openness on Income Inequality: A Tale of Low-Income and OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Archana Pillai

Abstract

This paper attempts to study the changing global economic and political environment and assess its impact on fundamentals like income inequality. Scholars have time and again studied the impact of globalization and intensity of the economy. But the integration of the political climate into a comprehensive framework is attempted here. The paper aims to study the process of income inequality in both the OECD and low-income countries within a framework of variables like level of democracy, FDI, trade intensity and growth in GDP per capita. It studies 54 countries for the period 1971-2000, using multiple regression analysis technique, and also checks for robustness and accuracy of the results. The variable of the political regime (level of democracy) is found to be significant. This validates the hypothesis of using the political environment in the studies on globalization or welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Archana Pillai, 2011. "Impact of Political Regime and Economic Openness on Income Inequality: A Tale of Low-Income and OECD Countries," The IUP Journal of Financial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(4), pages 60-75, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjfe:v:09:y:2011:i:4:p:60-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baek Inmee & Shi Qichao, 2016. "Impact of Economic Globalization on Income Inequality: Developed Economies vs Emerging Economies," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 49-61, March.
    2. Kalim SIDDIQUI, 2017. "Globalisation, trade liberalisation and economic development in the developing countries: An overview," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 514-529, December.
    3. Carole Ibrahim, 2022. "Globalization and income inequality in developing countries: a GMM approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjfe:v:09:y:2011:i:4:p:60-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.