IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/par123/v13y2024i1p42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating Public Land Rights in Rural China: Insights into Conflict Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangzhuo Wang
  • Nor Ashikin Mohamed Yusof
  • Siti Hasliah Salleh

Abstract

Land expropriation disputes, particularly those involving public land, are growing more prevalent in rural areas of China as urbanization picks up speed. Studies on land expropriation, urbanization, and farmers' rights abound, but there are very few that concentrate on the procedures used to settle public land disputes. There is a dearth of research on this topic, especially in rural areas where the focus is often on land expropriation during urbanization and urban land management challenges. This study uses interviews to examine the behaviors and effects of Chinese farmers who are pursuing public land rights to fill this research vacuum. To extract in-sights from the textual material provided by the interviews, the NVivo software tool was utilized in conjunction with the theme analysis technique. According to the study, these farmers mostly use normative claims and benefit distribution tactics, which reflects their intricate relationships inside the established legal system. Additionally, the study shows how farmers really implement land policy by using the social and political systems that are already in place to strengthen their negotiating position. These exchanges show that resolving conflicts over public land in rural areas is a social and political matter as much as a legal one, reflecting the dynamic shifts in power and interest structures within these communities. The study's conclusions give fresh viewpoints for comprehending and settling public land disputes in rural China, as well as important new information for developing and carrying out rural land policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangzhuo Wang & Nor Ashikin Mohamed Yusof & Siti Hasliah Salleh, 2024. "Negotiating Public Land Rights in Rural China: Insights into Conflict Resolution," Public Administration Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-42, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:par123:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/par/article/download/0/0/49974/54054
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/par/article/view/0/49974
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:par123:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.