IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jedpjl/v11y2021i1p28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Dichotomous Thinking on Depression in Japanese College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Takeyasu Kawabata
  • Naohiko Abe
  • Takafumi Wakai

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of dichotomous thinking on depression. We attempted to test the following hypotheses- 1) dichotomous thinking increases depression, and 2) dichotomous thinking has two routes to increase depression—direct, associative processing, and indirect, reflective processing. Two hundred Japanese college students (Males- 107, Females- 93, M age= 20.02 ± 1.42) were asked to complete the Dichotomous Thinking Inventory, which consists of three subscales- dichotomous belief, profit-and-loss thinking, and preference for dichotomy; the Kessler 6 Distress Scale; and the Japanese version of the Rumination-reflection Questionnaire. We conducted structural equation modelling to test the hypotheses. The results supported the hypotheses and indicated that dichotomous thinking increased depression. There were two different routes- dichotomous belief directly increased depression and profit-and-loss thinking indirectly increased depression by way of rumination. There are some implications of the findings. This study suggests that cognitive distortions might causes depression from two paths and practical interventions might also have two different routes or approaches to depression.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeyasu Kawabata & Naohiko Abe & Takafumi Wakai, 2021. "The Effects of Dichotomous Thinking on Depression in Japanese College Students," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jedpjl:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jedp/article/download/0/0/44766/47315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jedp/article/view/0/44766
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jedpjl:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.