IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijspjl/v9y2020i3p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Paradox in Bland-Altman Analysis and a Bernoulli Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Steven B. Kim
  • Jeffrey O. Wand

Abstract

A reliable method of measurement is important in various scientific areas. When a new method of measurement is developed, it should be tested against a standard method that is currently in use. Bland and Altman proposed limits of agreement (LOA) to compare two methods of measurement under the normality assumption. Recently, a sample size formula has been proposed for hypothesis testing to compare two methods of measurement. In the hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis states that the two methods do not satisfy a pre-specified acceptable degree of agreement. Carefully considering the interpretation of the LOA, we argue that there are cases of an acceptable degree of agreement inside the null parameter space. We refer to this subset as the paradoxical parameter space in this article. To address this paradox, we apply a Bernoulli approach to modify the null parameter space and to relax the normality assumption on the data. Using simulations, we demonstrate that the change in statistical power is not negligible when the true parameter values are inside or near the paradoxical parameter space. In addition, we demonstrate an application of the sequential probability ratio test to allow researchers to draw a conclusion with a smaller sample size and to reduce the study time.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven B. Kim & Jeffrey O. Wand, 2020. "A Paradox in Bland-Altman Analysis and a Bernoulli Approach," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 1-1, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/download/0/0/42352/44154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/view/0/42352
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.