IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v17y2023i11p70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Significance of Labour Process Theory to the Arab Gulf Countries: Developing A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Consent and Conflict in the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Ayman Adham

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on the main concepts of labour process theory to highlight its significance for analysing workers-managers struggles in workplaces of the Arab Gulf countries. The paper builds on the core principles of the labour process theory and engages the dimensions of neo-patriarchy and mobility power to build a conceptual framework for the analysis of workplace relations in the Arab Gulf context. Previous research show that the dialectics of control-consent-resistance and the concept of mobility power, are effective tools for analysing how work is organised in commercial organisations. Nevertheless, this paper argues that acknowledging the nature of ‘neo-patriarchal managerial control’, which is an ‘informal mode of management’, is vital for analysing the nature of power relations between the management and labour in workplaces of the Arab Gulf countries. Moreover, since the majority of the labour force in the Arab Gulf countries are migrants, the concept of mobility power has a critical role in explaining struggles between the management and migrant labour.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayman Adham, 2023. "The Significance of Labour Process Theory to the Arab Gulf Countries: Developing A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Consent and Conflict in the Workplace," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(11), pages 1-70, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:17:y:2023:i:11:p:70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/47957/51512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/47957
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Smith, 2006. "The double indeterminacy of labour power," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(2), pages 389-402, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharon C. Bolton, 2009. "Getting to the heart of the emotional labour process: a reply to Brook," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 549-560, September.
    2. Alex Veen & Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods, 2020. "Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 388-406, June.
    3. Laurence Romani & Patrizia Zanoni & Lotte Holck, 2021. "Radicalizing diversity (research): Time to resume talking about class," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 8-23, January.
    4. Elena Baglioni, 2018. "Labour control and the labour question in global production networks: exploitation and disciplining in Senegalese export horticulture," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 111-137.
    5. Wood, Alex & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2021. "Antagonism beyond employment: how the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy," SocArXiv y943w, Center for Open Science.
    6. Rutvica Andrijasevic & Devi Sacchetto & Ngai Pun, 2020. "One firm, two countries, one workplace model? The case of Foxconn’s internationalisation," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(2), pages 262-278, June.
    7. Claudio Morrison & Devi Sacchetto & Richard Croucher, 2020. "Migration, Ethnicity and Solidarity: ‘Multinational Workers’ in the Former Soviet Union," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 761-784, December.
    8. Harvey, Geraint & Turnbull, Peter & Wintersberger, Daniel, 2021. "Has Labour Paid for the Liberalisation of European civil aviation?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. David Jordhus-Lier & Anders Underthun & Kristina Zampoukos, 2019. "Changing workplace geographies: Restructuring warehouse employment in the Oslo region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 69-90, February.
    10. Rocio Bonet & Marta Elvira & Stefano Visintin, 2024. "Hiring Temps but Losing Perms? Temporary Worker Inflows and Voluntary Turnover of Permanent Employees," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 83-102, February.
    11. Yu Zheng & Chris Smith, 2018. "‘Chicken and Duck Talk’: Life and Death of Language Training at a Japanese Multinational in China," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(5), pages 887-905, October.
    12. Patricia Harrison & Helen Collins & Alexandra Bahor, 2022. "‘We Don’t Have the Same Opportunities as Others’: Shining Bourdieu’s Lens on UK Roma Migrants’ Precarious (Workers’) Habitus," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(2), pages 217-234, April.
    13. Sian Moore & Kirsty Newsome, 2018. "Paying for Free Delivery: Dependent Self-Employment as a Measure of Precarity in Parcel Delivery," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(3), pages 475-492, June.
    14. Debra Howcroft & Birgitta Bergvall-KÃ¥reborn, 2019. "A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(1), pages 21-38, February.
    15. Agnieszka Rydzik & Sundari Anitha, 2020. "Conceptualising the Agency of Migrant Women Workers: Resilience, Reworking and Resistance," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(5), pages 883-899, October.
    16. Xiaotian Li, 2023. "Managerial Technique and Worker Subjectivity in Dialogue: Understanding Overwork in China’s Internet Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(6), pages 1699-1716, December.
    17. Michal Carrington & Andreas Chatzidakis & Deirdre Shaw, 2021. "Consuming Worker Exploitation? Accounts and Justifications for Consumer (In)action to Modern Slavery," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(3), pages 432-450, June.
    18. Paul Edwards & Andy Hodder, 2022. "Conflict and control in the contemporary workplace: Structured antagonism revisited," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 220-240, May.
    19. Anita Hammer & Ayman Adham, 2023. "Mobility Power, State and the ‘Sponsored Labour Regime’ in Saudi Capitalism," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(6), pages 1497-1516, December.
    20. Jacques Bélanger & Paul Edwards, 2007. "The Conditions Promoting Compromise in the Workplace," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 713-734, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:17:y:2023:i:11:p:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.