IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbjnl/v11y2021i4p51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subtraction-Like Effect in an Ant Faced with Numbers of Elements Including a Crossed One

Author

Listed:
  • Marie-Claire Cammaerts
  • Roger Cammaerts

Abstract

When trained to a number of colored elements of which one was crossed, tested Myrmica sabuleti worker ants reacted essentially to that number of elements excluding the crossed one. They thus apparently subtracted the crossed element, moreover doing so better for fewer numbers of elements. When trained in the same way but tested in front of a number of uncrossed elements equal to the total number of crossed and uncrossed elements seen during training, and at the same time, to the same number of elements without the crossed one as well as to the crossed element only, the ants again reacted essentially to the number of elements minus the crossed one. Again, they did so better for smaller numbers. The ants reacted thus to the visual cue they best saw during training. They also somewhat reacted to the isolated crossed element and better when trained to lower numbers of elements. When trained to a number of uncrossed colored elements and at the same time, to a cue showing the same number of elements, but one crossed and the others uncolored, the tested ants reacted more to the initial total number of colored elements than to the same total number of colored elements minus the crossed one. This showed again that the ants did not really subtract, but reacted to what they the most distinctly saw during training. They also again better reacted in presence of fewer elements.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie-Claire Cammaerts & Roger Cammaerts, 2021. "Subtraction-Like Effect in an Ant Faced with Numbers of Elements Including a Crossed One," International Journal of Biology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 1-51, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbjnl:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijb/article/download/0/0/40483/41883
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijb/article/view/0/40483
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbjnl:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.