IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v9y2019i2p117-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Digital Tools to Assess and Improve College Student Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Sweety Law

Abstract

Employers have continually indicated that writing instruction is much needed in higher education across all majors. It has become more imperative now than before to better prepare our graduates for professional success in an age of increasing writing necessity, data analytics and reporting, and technical sophistication. Writing assessment in a class setting has learning goals and needs to be differentiated from a mass testing evaluation context. When learning to write well, especially relating to subject-specific content, feedback is necessary. Performing analysis and evaluation, then providing explanation and recommendations takes time. Newer digital tools can provide formative feedback; and therefore transparency about grading as well. Among teaching tasks, grading assignments consumes the majority of online faculty time. This study identifies what type of online grading could take up the majority of faculty time and specifies estimates of time needed for such grading. Faculty workload is high in adopting an optimal combined formative and summative assessment model. Results of the study might help develop more sound policies of academic support. Faculty might use the study¡¯s information for better curricula planning and improved utilization of student assistants.

Suggested Citation

  • Sweety Law, 2019. "Using Digital Tools to Assess and Improve College Student Writing," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 117-123, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:117-123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/39019/39772
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/39019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital; tools; instruction; writing; assessment; time;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:117-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.