IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v9y2019i1p22-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Quitting Double-degree Programs: Students' Perceptions in China

Author

Listed:
  • Chuying Ou
  • Huiyu Zhang
  • Manjing Pan
  • Zhijian Dai

Abstract

Around the world, colleges have been providing opportunities for students to participate in double-degree programs. In the past 30 years, double-degree education at tertiary level has been developing fast in China. While many studies focused on its positive effects, little attention was paid to its shortcomings. Through a focus group interview of five undergraduates from a Chinese university, this study revealed some underlying deficiencies of China¡¯s double-degree education. The interview comprehensively uncovered participants¡¯ motives, expectations, difficulties and reasons for quitting with regard to their double-degree programs. Colleges¡¯ failure to live up to expectations (i.e., quality of courses, teachers, job prospects) and students¡¯ lack of external support were found to be the main causes that led students to cease their studies. School policies and personal reasons also contributed to their decisions. This research provides advice for future curriculum planning and management of double-degree education from the perspectives of students, teachers and universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuying Ou & Huiyu Zhang & Manjing Pan & Zhijian Dai, 2019. "Why Quitting Double-degree Programs: Students' Perceptions in China," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 22-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:22-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/37531/37961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/37531
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    double-degree education; undergraduate; China; qualitative study;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:22-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.