IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v13y2021i9p16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Gynaecological Cancer Patients in Enugu, South-East Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Leonard Ogbonna Ajah
  • Dickson Tochukwu Ifezuoke
  • Monique Iheoma Ajah
  • Theophilus Ogochukwu Nwankwo
  • Ijeoma Victoria Ezeome
  • Uchenna Anthony Umeh
  • Polycarp Uche Agu

Abstract

INTRODUCTION- The high cost and associated adverse effects of conventional therapy make the patients seek complementary and alternative medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine use may contribute to the delay the patients have before seeking orthodox care. OBJECTIVES- To determine the prevalence, pattern, factors responsible for complementary and alternative medicine use and if complementary and alternative medicine use causes delay in seeking orthodox care among gynaecological cancer patients in Enugu. MATERIAL & METHODS- A pretested, semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire -based cross-sectional survey of 396 eligible gynaecological cancer patients recruited from both University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu and Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital, Enugu between January, 2018 and June, 2020. The data was analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL). RESULTS- The mean age of the respondents was 57.3 years and it ranged from 41 to 77 years. Cervical cancer (76%) was the most common type of gynaecological cancer. A total of 283(71.5%) of the respondents used complementary and alternative medicine. Herbs (65%) were the most common type of complementary and alternative medicine used. Majority (56.9%) of complementary and alternative medicine users rarely used it. A total of 178(62.8%) complementary and alternative medicine users presumed that it would cure them while 105 (37.1%) presumed that it would relieve the symptoms of their cancer. However, 197 (69.6%) complementary and alternative medicine users stated that there was no actual benefit from its use. The low educational status has a statistically significant influence on complementary and alternative medicine use among the respondents(P-value=<0.0001). Complementary and alternative medicine use had a significant influence on delay to seek orthodox care among the study participants (P-value=<0.0001). Majority (84.5%) of the doctors, caring for the patients, were not aware of the patients’ use of complementary and alternative medicine. CONCLUSION- Complementary and alternative medicine use among gynaecological cancer patients is high in Enugu. It also delays their presentation for orthodox care. Female education and public sensitization on the effect of complementary and alternative medicine use is necessary to curb this trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonard Ogbonna Ajah & Dickson Tochukwu Ifezuoke & Monique Iheoma Ajah & Theophilus Ogochukwu Nwankwo & Ijeoma Victoria Ezeome & Uchenna Anthony Umeh & Polycarp Uche Agu, 2021. "Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Gynaecological Cancer Patients in Enugu, South-East Nigeria," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/45667/48558
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/45667
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.