IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v12y2020i9p50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Stress Level and Coping Mechanisms Among Health Allied Students

Author

Listed:
  • Abd Alhadi Hasan
  • Hussein Alqarni
  • Nofaa Ali Alasmee

Abstract

Purposes- This study identified and compared between the levels and types of stressors as well as coping behaviors. Design- Cross-Sectional Survey Methods- Data were collected using a convenience sample of 286 students Findings- The results showed that ‘‘teachers and nursing staff’ ’and ‘‘assignments and workload’’ were the highest sources of stress among nursing and MLS students. But this was much higher among nursing students. In addition, lack of professional knowledge and skills were cited the least stressors among both students’ groups. Practice Implications- The result can be used to support Nursing student to utilize positive coping mechanism to deal with stress successfully. Enhance academic staff awareness about re-allocation of the academic demands and the emphasis on the benefit of orientation week for the students.

Suggested Citation

  • Abd Alhadi Hasan & Hussein Alqarni & Nofaa Ali Alasmee, 2020. "Perceived Stress Level and Coping Mechanisms Among Health Allied Students," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-50, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/43194/45347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/43194
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.