IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v15y2022i12p43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contrastive Study on Lexical Bundles in Argumentative Writing by L1-Chinese and L1-English Undergraduates

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Guan

Abstract

This study compares the use of lexical bundles in argumentative essays written by L1-Chinese students and L1-English students through a corpus-based approach. The data consist of two corpora- a L1-Chinese corpus with 506 English argumentative essays produced by Chinese undergraduates in disciplines related to science and engineering and a L1-English corpus with 207 argumentative essays written by L1-English undergraduates. The identified lexical bundles were analyzed both structurally and functionally. The findings suggest that L1-Chinese students used significantly more types and tokens of lexical bundle structures than L1-English students, and also employed all the three functional categories of bundles more frequently than L1-English students. In addition, L1-Chinese students’ writing was marked by a higher preference for clause-based bundles, which features the academic writing of lower-proficiency writers, and a wide use of conversational bundles (e.g. a lot of people), which implies their lack of awareness of academic register. The pedagogical implications are then provided regarding lexical bundles for ESL teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Guan, 2022. "A Contrastive Study on Lexical Bundles in Argumentative Writing by L1-Chinese and L1-English Undergraduates," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(12), pages 1-43, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/48053/51636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/48053
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.