IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibl/journl/v5y2011i1p19-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Repugnant", "Not Repugnant at All": How the Respective Epistemic Attitudes of Georges Lemaitre and Sir Arthur Eddington Influenced How Each Approached the Idea of a Beginning of the Universe

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Appolloni

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

This paper investigates how the different epistemic attitudes held by scientists George Lemaître and Sir Arthur Eddington decidedly influenced how they conducted their research on cosmology. It demonstrates the degree to which epistemic attitudes matter in scientific research. Though both scientists were Christian, a belief in God or in biblically inspired narratives does not explain satisfactorily why these two Christians remained at such opposite ends of thinking with regard to the idea of a beginning of a universe, especially considering Lemaître and Eddington each put forth his case in a scientific manner. The paper finds that had both entered into a dialogue on each other's epistemic attitude, a great amount of needless energy spent on arguing might have avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Appolloni, 2011. ""Repugnant", "Not Repugnant at All": How the Respective Epistemic Attitudes of Georges Lemaitre and Sir Arthur Eddington Influenced How Each Approached the Idea of a Beginning of t," IBSU Scientific Journal, International Black Sea University, vol. 5(1), pages 19-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibl:journl:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:19-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.ibsu.edu.ge/index.php/ibsusj/article/download/180/175
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    epistemology; science; religion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C99 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibl:journl:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:19-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Salavat Sayfullin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feibsge.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.