IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/rbfstu/v10y2019i1p15-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventory Costing: A Comprehensive Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Harris
  • Umapathy Ananthanarayanan

Abstract

Under Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 330, Inventory requires an entity to measure inventory at lower of cost or market. Market value can be determined in three methods: replacement cost, net realizable value or net realizable value less profit margin. The Federal Accounting Standards Board (FASB) received comments from users that the current guidance on the measurement of inventory is unnecessarily complex because there are three potential outcomes to determine market. In response to these concerns, FASB issued ASU 2015-11 to simplify the measurement of inventory as part of the FASB’s Simplification initiative. In this paper, we outline the new mechanism proposed by FASB for measuring inventory and how it would impact entity’s financial statements. We provide a series of comprehensive questions relating to Lower of Cost and Net Realizable Value, and Lower of Cost or Market at the end of the paper. This case study is best suited for the Intermediate Accounting 1 course

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Harris & Umapathy Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Inventory Costing: A Comprehensive Case Study," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 10(1), pages 15-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:rbfstu:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:15-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/rbfstu/rbfs-v10n1-2019/RBFS-V10N1-2019-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuela Lucchese & Ferdinando Di Carlo, 2021. "Inventories Accounting under US-GAAP and IFRS Standards: The Differences That Hinder the Full Convergence," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 180-180, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ASU 2015-11; ASC 330; Lower of Cost or Market; Lower of Cost or Net Realizable Value; Net Realizable Value; FIFO; LIFO; Replacement Cost; Inventory Floor;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:rbfstu:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:15-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.