IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/gjbres/v9y2015i4p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metaphors Impact Daily Decisions By Managers And Leaders

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Weaver

Abstract

In a world filled with complexities, people have turned to metaphors to provide a meaningful way to comprehend and communicate what they experience. In recent business literature, metaphors are used to describe organizations, and even guide the diagnosis of problems, because of their power to draw attention particular aspects of real situations. Extensive literature exists promoting various metaphors in this role or reviewing the efficacy of their use. What has not been explored is whether people in organizations also use metaphors, often without conscious thought, in ways that influence their decisions. The assumption here is that metaphors operate like powerful paradigms that have associated values, beliefs, language, and actions. This research explores the following questions: Can metaphors and associated paradigms be identified? Can preferences for particular metaphors be measured using preferences for particular sets of values, beliefs, language and actions? In a sample of 176 students, the researcher was able to provide an answer of yes to both of the questions. People do have preferences for particular metaphors, even if they have not named them. Those preferences, through the associated values, beliefs, and actions, impact the practical decisions that are made in organizations

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Weaver, 2015. "Metaphors Impact Daily Decisions By Managers And Leaders," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:9:y:2015:i:4:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v9n4-2015/GJBR-V9N4-2015-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business Administration; Management; Metaphors; Decision-Making;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:9:y:2015:i:4:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.