IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/gjbres/v17y2023i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Return On Equity Estimates And Fourquadrant Square Position: Evidence From Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Chuan Miao
  • Hsiou-Wei Lin

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which security analysts’ forecasts help improve our classifying the observations into the Damodaran’s four-quadrant square box. Based on the square box, we show that companies classified into quadrant (I) by Historical Return on Equity (HROE) will move to quadrant (II) in the subsequent period. We find security analysts perform better than HROE in predicting the fourquadrant box outcome in the subsequent period. Our empirical result shows the Consensus Return on Equity (CROE) performs better than HROE in predicting the four-quadrant box in the subsequent period. Due to the fact that a firm’s accounting earnings may deviate from its economic earnings, analysts may strategically pursue forecast accuracy, especially in the short term, at the expense of information users in the long term. Specifically, analysts’ longer-horizon earnings forecasts may be more informative than current- and subsequent-year EPS forecasts as to the true value of a firm’s long-term investment projects. Accordingly, analysts’ longer-termed earnings forecasts outperform their current- and subsequent-year EPS forecasts in predicting the four-quadrant box in the subsequent period.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Chuan Miao & Hsiou-Wei Lin, 2023. "Return On Equity Estimates And Fourquadrant Square Position: Evidence From Taiwan," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v17n1-2023/GJBR-V17N1-2023-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Return on Equity; Analyst Consensus Estimates; Dividend Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G35 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Payout Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.