IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/gjbres/v11y2017i2p27-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Explanation Of Financial Market Anomalies: Risk-Based Or Behavioral View? A New Perspective On Financial Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Wen Yang
  • Chun-An Li
  • Sam Ting-Hsin Hsu

Abstract

At present, there are two main explanations for market anomalies, namely, risk-based and behavioral. While the risk-based perspective states that abnormal returns arise owing to investors undertaking financial risks, the behavioral perspective states that abnormal returns arise owing to investor psychology. However, we believe that the source of abnormal returns originates from financing constraints. Viewed from a different perspective, financial constraints arise from information asymmetry, which in turn leads to an incorrect assessment of behavior. Moreover, the risk of financial distress also has a correlation with financial constraint. The link between the two provides another common explanation for market anomalies. This study utilizes publicly disclosed stock data of the Taiwan stock exchange in order to prove the above argument. Furthermore, apart from the commonly observed explanations of under- and overreaction, cash dividends can also logically explain the extent of under- and overreaction, which plays a critical role in determining the expected returns of an asset portfolio

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Wen Yang & Chun-An Li & Sam Ting-Hsin Hsu, 2017. "An Explanation Of Financial Market Anomalies: Risk-Based Or Behavioral View? A New Perspective On Financial Constraints," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 11(2), pages 27-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:27-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/REPEC/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v11n2-2017/GJBR-V11N2-2017-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Underreaction; Overreaction; Three-Factor Model; Financial Constraint;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:27-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.