IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hrs/journl/vixy2017i1p119-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Greenspace Agreement, External Diseconomy And Residents’ Risk Assesment

Author

Listed:
  • Kenichi SHIMAMOTO

    (Associate Professor, Hirao School of Management, Konan University)

Abstract

The greenspace agreement is an effective method to promote the conservation and creation of greenspace. In this paper, the mechanism of the formation of the greenspace agreement is analysed using the coalition game. As a result, it was identified that the greenspace agreement requires a certain level of supporters in order to be formed and the most desirable situation is when there is a universal agreement. It also identified the possibility of the existence of free riders which could prevent a unanimous support of the greenspace agreement. The number of supporters of the greenspace agreement and number of free riders are dependent on the size of the external diseconomy caused by the lack of consideration for greenspace, the government’s enforceability of taxes on the diseconomy and the decline in land prices due to the external diseconomies from the neglect of greenspace. Furthermore, it was found that it was also influenced by the residents and stakeholder’s risk assessment based on their view towards the government’s enforceability of taxes and the rate of decline in land prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenichi SHIMAMOTO, 2017. "The Relationship Between Greenspace Agreement, External Diseconomy And Residents’ Risk Assesment," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 119-126, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:hrs:journl:v:ix:y:2017:i:1:p:119-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/June_2017/9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Greenspace agreement; coalition game; free rider; external diseconomy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • R0 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hrs:journl:v:ix:y:2017:i:1:p:119-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrios K. Kouzas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.