IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hop/hopeec/v44y2012i4p619-641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enlightened Reforms and Economic Discourse in the Portuguese-Brazilian Empire (1750-1808)

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Luis Cardoso
  • Alexandre Mendes Cunha

Abstract

In this article we discuss the role of political economy in the design and implementation of economic and political reforms that occurred in Brazil in the second half of the eighteenth century. Brazil was during this period still a part, the most important part, of the Portuguese empire. The reading of economic texts of this period allows for an interpretation of the role played by the enlightened economic literature to challenge and transform the existing structures of the old colonial regime, as well as to prepare Brazil for its future path of economic and political independence. The new visions and representations of the empire were put forward by authors faithful to enlightened mercantilist and cameralist doctrines supporting the reform of colonial administration. However, the most relevant policy measures were implemented under the shadow of Adam Smith, whose system of political economy also included a new way of looking at both the nature of colonial trade and the need for its reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Luis Cardoso & Alexandre Mendes Cunha, 2012. "Enlightened Reforms and Economic Discourse in the Portuguese-Brazilian Empire (1750-1808)," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 619-641, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:44:y:2012:i:4:p:619-641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hope.dukejournals.org/content/44/4/619.full.pdf+html
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:44:y:2012:i:4:p:619-641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?viewby=journal&productid=45614 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.