IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlnrp/706842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participation in Decision Making as a Property of Complex Adaptive Systems: Developing and Testing a Measure

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth A. Anderson
  • Donde Plowman
  • Kirsten Corazzini
  • Pi-Ching Hsieh
  • Hui Fang Su
  • Lawrence R. Landerman
  • Reuben R. McDaniel

Abstract

Objectives. To (1) describe participation in decision-making as a systems-level property of complex adaptive systems and (2) present empirical evidence of reliability and validity of a corresponding measure. Method. Study 1 was a mail survey of a single respondent (administrators or directors of nursing) in each of 197 nursing homes. Study 2 was a field study using random, proportionally stratified sampling procedure that included 195 organizations with 3,968 respondents. Analysis. In Study 1, we analyzed the data to reduce the number of scale items and establish initial reliability and validity. In Study 2, we strengthened the psychometric test using a large sample. Results. Results demonstrated validity and reliability of the participation in decision-making instrument (PDMI) while measuring participation of workers in two distinct job categories (RNs and CNAs). We established reliability at the organizational level aggregated items scores. We established validity of the multidimensional properties using convergent and discriminant validity and confirmatory factor analysis. Conclusions. Participation in decision making, when modeled as a systems-level property of organization, has multiple dimensions and is more complex than is being traditionally measured. Managers can use this model to form decision teams that maximize the depth and breadth of expertise needed and to foster connection among them.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth A. Anderson & Donde Plowman & Kirsten Corazzini & Pi-Ching Hsieh & Hui Fang Su & Lawrence R. Landerman & Reuben R. McDaniel, 2013. "Participation in Decision Making as a Property of Complex Adaptive Systems: Developing and Testing a Measure," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:706842
    DOI: 10.1155/2013/706842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/NRP/2013/706842.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/NRP/2013/706842.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2013/706842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:706842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.