IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlaor/6367037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redesign of the Attention Process of Patients with Rheumatologic Diseases: Assessing the Performance with Analytic Hierarchy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Iouri Gorbanev
  • Ariel Cortes
  • Sandra Agudelo-Londoño

Abstract

Objective . To compare the Business process management and the analytic hierarchy process as the tools of process performance assessment. Instruments and Methods . Case study of the attention process of rheumatology patients. Business process management and analytic hierarchy process were applied to assess the redesign of the attention process. The two methods were compared. The data were obtained through personal observations, an interview with a Colombian health insurer’s senior executive, and retrospective documentary analysis. Results . Both methods assessed the process redesign as an improvement. While Business process management made a qualitative evaluation, the analytic hierarchy process allowed for a quantitative approach. Conclusions . Business process management is helpful in process performance assessment because it offers a conceptual foundation. Analytic hierarchy process is a complement which makes the intuitions based on business process management rigorous.

Suggested Citation

  • Iouri Gorbanev & Ariel Cortes & Sandra Agudelo-Londoño, 2017. "Redesign of the Attention Process of Patients with Rheumatologic Diseases: Assessing the Performance with Analytic Hierarchy Process," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-6, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlaor:6367037
    DOI: 10.1155/2017/6367037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/AOR/2017/6367037.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/AOR/2017/6367037.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2017/6367037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlaor:6367037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.