IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/7471460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Flexible Polynomial Expansion Method for Response Analysis with Random Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Rugao Gao
  • Keping Zhou
  • Yun Lin

Abstract

The generalized Polynomial Chaos Expansion Method (gPCEM), which is a random uncertainty analysis method by employing the orthogonal polynomial bases from the Askey scheme to represent the random space, has been widely used in engineering applications due to its good performance in both computational efficiency and accuracy. But in gPCEM, a nonlinear transformation of random variables should always be used to adapt the generalized Polynomial Chaos theory for the analysis of random problems with complicated probability distributions, which may introduce nonlinearity in the procedure of random uncertainty propagation as well as leading to approximation errors on the probability distribution function (PDF) of random variables. This paper aims to develop a flexible polynomial expansion method for response analysis of the finite element system with bounded random variables following arbitrary probability distributions. Based on the large family of Jacobi polynomials, an Improved Jacobi Chaos Expansion Method (IJCEM) is proposed. In IJCEM, the response of random system is approximated by the Jacobi expansion with the Jacobi polynomial basis whose weight function is the closest to the probability density distribution (PDF) of the random variable. Subsequently, the moments of the response can be efficiently calculated though the Jacobi expansion. As the IJCEM avoids the necessity that the PDF should be represented in terms of the weight function of polynomial basis by using the variant transformation, neither the nonlinearity nor the errors on random models will be introduced in IJCEM. Numerical examples on two random problems show that compared with gPCEM, the IJCEM can achieve better efficiency and accuracy for random problems with complex probability distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rugao Gao & Keping Zhou & Yun Lin, 2018. "A Flexible Polynomial Expansion Method for Response Analysis with Random Parameters," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:7471460
    DOI: 10.1155/2018/7471460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2018/7471460.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2018/7471460.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2018/7471460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sudret, B. & Mai, C.V., 2015. "Computing derivative-based global sensitivity measures using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 241-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhan, Hongyou & Xiao, Ning-Cong & Ji, Yuxiang, 2022. "An adaptive parallel learning dependent Kriging model for small failure probability problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    3. Wong, Chun Yui & Seshadri, Pranay & Parks, Geoffrey, 2021. "Extremum sensitivity analysis with polynomial Monte Carlo filtering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Liu, Xing & Ferrario, Elisa & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "Identifying resilient-important elements in interdependent critical infrastructures by sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 423-434.
    5. Marrel, Amandine & Chabridon, Vincent, 2021. "Statistical developments for target and conditional sensitivity analysis: Application on safety studies for nuclear reactor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Jiacheng Liu & Haiyun Liu & Cong Zhang & Jiyin Cao & Aibo Xu & Jiwei Hu, 2024. "Derivative-Variance Hybrid Global Sensitivity Measure with Optimal Sampling Method Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Schöbi, Roland & Sudret, Bruno, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis in the context of imprecise probabilities (p-boxes) using sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 129-141.
    8. Oladyshkin, Sergey & Nowak, Wolfgang, 2018. "Incomplete statistical information limits the utility of high-order polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 137-148.
    9. Cao, Runan & Sun, Zhili & Wang, Jian & Guo, Fanyi, 2022. "A single-loop reliability analysis strategy for time-dependent problems with small failure probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    10. Chen, Weidong & Xu, Chunlong & Shi, Yaqin & Ma, Jingxin & Lu, Shengzhuo, 2019. "A hybrid Kriging-based reliability method for small failure probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 31-41.
    11. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Wenjie & Wang, Donghui & Zhao, Kun & Zhang, Weihua, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis using orthogonal augmented radial basis function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 291-302.
    12. Konakli, Katerina & Sudret, Bruno, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using low-rank tensor approximations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 64-83.
    13. Xiao, Sinan & Lu, Zhenzhou & Xu, Liyang, 2016. "A new effective screening design for structural sensitivity analysis of failure probability with the epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-14.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:7471460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.