IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/2691804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Consensus Model considering the Experts’ Adjustment Willingness Based on the Interactive Weights’ Determination

Author

Listed:
  • Shizhen Bai
  • Hao He
  • Dan Luo
  • Mengke Ge
  • Ruobing Yang
  • Xinrui Bi
  • Zeljko Stevic

Abstract

This study proposes a large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) consensus model considering the experts’ adjustment willingness based on the interactive weights’ determination, which can be applied to an LSGDM problem through a case of earthquake shelters. The main contributions of our research are of three aspects as follows. First, the determination method of the interactive weight, which obtains the DMs’ attitude towards the decision-making results, is presented. The subgroups’ weights are calculated, and the unit adjustment cost for each DM is defined. Second, we introduce an objective consensus threshold by the mean and variance of the consensus level for each subgroup. Subsequently, an identification rule is performed to determine the DM to be adjusted with the large difference and the low adjustment cost. And we developed a novel consensus adjustment method that takes the DMs’ adjustment willingness into account to retain as much original information as possible. Thirdly, in order to reduce the subjectivity of the preset consensus threshold and the maximum number of iterations, an objective consensus termination condition that combines the current group consensus level and the consensus adjustment rate is put forward. Finally, the proposed model has demonstrated its effectiveness and superiority based on the comparative and sensitive analysis through a practical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Shizhen Bai & Hao He & Dan Luo & Mengke Ge & Ruobing Yang & Xinrui Bi & Zeljko Stevic, 2022. "A Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Consensus Model considering the Experts’ Adjustment Willingness Based on the Interactive Weights’ Determination," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:2691804
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/2691804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2022/2691804.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2022/2691804.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/2691804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:2691804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.