IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v5y2011i2p58-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: The Cassandra Challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Ron Johnston

    (Australian Centre for Innovation, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sydney (Australia))

Abstract

Rapidly changing context as well as growing uncertainty in almost all spheres of life lead to an understanding that standard means are not applicable to solving emerging complex issues. The ability to anticipate major emerging challenges is more relevant than ever before. Renowned international institutions constantly inform on coming challenges and threats, however, the topic of futures research does not receive proper attention. The paper examines why despite evident seriousness of the situation future studies are not in relevant demand and provides a detailed explanation. The author provides examples of the Foresight practices that had significant or in contrast few impact on decision making in various countries. The study is based on interviews with the participants of the International Conference "Future-Oriented Technology Analysis" (FTA). The answers illustrated the present state of FTA, its objectives and the vector. Analysis of expert opinions leads to the following conclusions. Poorly developed partnerships have a negative influence on the use and development of the FTA. Most managers are not familiar with these tools and their capabilities. There is deeply rooted opinion that unforeseen events will always occur, and there are inevitable limitations to any attempt to influence the future, and therefore the ability to change anything is minuscule. This belief only strengthens the current trend. In many countries, government officials have been largely resistant to the concept and the value of FTA. It does not fit easily with established public administration procedures and protocols. This situation has several explanations: the universities have no educational programs on FTA; managers lack the knowledge and skills to foresee serious challenges. In addition there is a lack of a reliable method enabling to assess FTA mechanisms and prove its effectiveness. The challenge for high impact FTA is to select issues that not necessarily have long time horizon, but rather are relevant and bottom-line. Special education and training in this field are needed. Therefore, a key challenge for the next generation of FTA projects is to shift focus from expertise building to rooting recognition of importance of FTA learning among non-specialists. This presumes the introduction of special issues into the curricula of schools and universities, as well as training of public officers. Note: Downloadable document is in Russian.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Johnston, 2011. "Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: The Cassandra Challenge," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 58-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:58-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2012/09/04/1241908464/7-Johnston-58-64.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anatoliy Alabugin & Sergei Aliukov & Tatyana Khudyakova, 2022. "Models and Methods of Formation of the Foresight-Controlling Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Rafael Popper, 2012. "Mapping Futures Studies," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 56-75.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    future-oriented technology analysis (FTA); policy-making; decision-making;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:58-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.