IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v5y2011i1p40-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

«Useless» Science: How to Evaluate Performance of Basic Research

Author

Listed:
  • Helmut Gassler

    (Centre for Economic and Innovation Research, Joanneum Research (Austria))

  • Andreas Schibany

    (Centre for Economic and Innovation Research, Joanneum Research (Austria))

Abstract

In many countries which have limited R&D budgets are confronted with discussions about the feasibility and appropriateness of supporting basic science and research. Among these countries is Austria – the country of origin of the authors. Basic research as opposed to applied research aims at increasing the stock of knowledgeper sewithout any consideration to applicability. Meanwhile, there is a widely held belief that publicly funded research must result in economic gains. Thus basic research is inherently under pressure of having to prove its favorable effects on the economy. In recent years such rhetoric has even intensified. Moreover the so-called ‘free-rider’ strategy presumes that it is ambiguous for a small economy to invest in costly basic research when the results of other countries’ basic research are published and available without charge as public goods. The authors provide a retrospective analysis of the discussed issue. From his point of view rejection of developing country’s internal scientific base is reckless in terms of responsibility for the future of coming generations. Explaining the causes of way-out views, the authors offer a look at the situation from a different perspective paying attention to known facts. Because of its high degree of specialization basic research is often thought of as abstract and out of touch with reality, but in the main it is inspired and set off by practical questions. Undoubtedly, an early estimate of its effects is quite complicated, since basic research outputs usually require a significant time lag to be transformed into commercial product. The authors suggest that in the future it will remain difficult to fully assess the impact of basic research on economic growth and to provide clear answers to the questions raised. Numerous evidences however demonstrate that application of the knowledge gained from the basic research promotes the emergence of entirely new industrial developments. Basic science, supported by the government and development undertaken by the private sector, are able to be complementary and act in tandem. Today more than ever before there is a need for free, i.e. unrestricted, science-oriented research, namely for doing that part of research work which private companies can and will no longer afford. These projects contribute to the expansion of a company’s technological capacities by providing access to existing knowledge, guaranteeing the possibility of their use and further development, etc. It is proved that a country rejecting development of its own research facilities and skilled personnel will not be able to take advantage from the achievements gained by other nations. Availability of highly qualified and skilled scientists is essential for an efficient capture of new knowledge. Companies, possessing similar human capital, have the ability to absorb information from outside thus increasing in-house expertise. The authors draw attention to the possibility for companies to conduct R&D in collaboration with universities. This will allow the commercialization of research results as well as investments in innovative entrepreneurial initiatives. In Austria, this type of funding so far remains underdeveloped. Note: Downloadable document is in Russian.

Suggested Citation

  • Helmut Gassler & Andreas Schibany, 2011. "«Useless» Science: How to Evaluate Performance of Basic Research," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 40-47.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:40-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2012/04/05/1251282867/40-47.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikhail Gershman & Galina Kitova, 2017. "Assessing Government Support for Research and Innovation in Russian Universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 1067-1084, September.
    2. Mikhail A. Gershman & Galina A. Kitova, 2016. "Evaluation of Research and Innovation Policies: The Case of Russian Universities," HSE Working papers WP BRP 57/STI/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    indirect effects; knowledge accessibility; measurability of results;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:40-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.