IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v1y2007i3p49-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Expectancy – The More We Know the Longer We Live?

Author

Listed:
  • Evgeny Andreev

    (&Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany))

  • Dmitry Zhdanov

    (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany))

Abstract

The demographic history of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) was investigated. We attempted to evaluate main demographic characteristics and role of mortality decrease among the members and corresponding members of the Academy. The number of academicians and their mean age remained relatively stable up to 1921. Intensive growth in number of academicians started in the 1920s. It grew from 225 in 1921 to 1116 in the mid-2006. Between 1921 and 1960 this growth was accompanied by decrease in the mean age of academicians: from 64.9 in 1921 to 60.1 in the end of the 1940s. Since the 1950s, the mean age has been increasing reaching the maximal level of 69.4 years in the mid-2006. To describe mortality level of academicians, we calculated abridged life tables for each ten-year period. Our results show that, until 1951, life expectancy at age 50 among academicians fluctuated at the level 20.4 - 23.1 years. In the end of 19th century, life expectancy advantage of academicians against the life expectancy of Russian males was only one year. At the same time, life expectancy of the Russian academicians was 1.8 years lower than for Swedish men. Between 1941-1950 and 2001-2006, life expectancy of members of the Academy grew by about 10 years (from 22.1 to 31.9 years). Mean age of newly elected members of the Academy has been relatively stable. Throughout the whole period, this indicator was fluctuating between 49.8 and 56.0 years. Thus, aging of the academic community is mainly related to life expectancy growth. As result, due to simultaneous mortality decline and aging of academicians, crude death rate has remained almost unchanged throughout the period (around 25 per 1000). Only slightly higher rates were observed at the beginning and at the end of the period of observation. Adverse mortality trends among adult Russian males did not affect the academic community. As result, opposite mortality trends occurred among the total males and academic elite. The difference in life expectancy at age 50 increased from 2.4 years in 1951-1960 (24.3 versus 21.9 years) to 13.6 years in 2000-2006 (31.9 versus 18.3 years). However, life expectancy in the academic community is unexpectedly low. According to the most recent data, life expectancy of Russian academicians is only 2 years higher than for all Swedish men and 0.7 year lower than for highly educated Swedish men with non-manual occupational status. It is difficult to explain such low life expectancy of Russian academicians. Unfavorable male mortality situation in Russia is usually attributed to the consequences of heavy. Note: Downloadable document is in Russian.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgeny Andreev & Dmitry Zhdanov, 2007. "Life Expectancy – The More We Know the Longer We Live?," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 1(3), pages 49-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:49-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2012/07/26/1208182378/Andreev-Zhdanov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    lifestyle; mortality of population; academic science in Russia; scientific elite;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
    • J61 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:49-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.