IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecohse/202233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Reforms in Electricity Sector: Pros and Cons

Author

Listed:
  • Yulia Vymyatnina

    (European University at Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Yulia Raskina

    (European University at Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Elena Artyukhova

    (European University at Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Elena Babkina

    (European University at Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Until the 1980s, the electricity industry was typically organized as vertically integrated monopolies. A combination of technological, economic and ideological prerequisites has led to the fact that, starting from the 1980-90s, market reforms in the electric power industry have become the world norm. It was expected that the introduction of market relations in the industry would lead to an increase in its efficiency and, accordingly, to an increase in the social welfare. However, in practice, reforms were often accompanied by problems at all stages of their implementation, and assessments of the results of reforms in various countries do not always provide an unambiguous picture of success. The paper summarizes the experience of reforming the electricity sector in terms of comparing the results expected from theoretical considerations with the problems that arise in the process of reforming and the practical results of the reforms. We have analyzed a large body of literature that has studied the results of market reforms in the electricity sector as a whole or their individual stages in different countries and at different stages of reform completion. Research demonstrates that in order to improve public welfare as a result of the reform, it is necessary to ensure an effective and flexible regulatory policy in the post-reform industry. One of the most problematic aspects of the reforms is the need to ensure that long-term investments in the electricity sector are attracted in volumes sufficient to ensure the reliable functioning of all segments of the industry in the new conditions. Another problem that often arises is the distribution of benefits from the reform, a signi­ficant part of which goes to companies in the industry and the state, while the benefits often do not reach consumers. An important conclusion of our work is that there are no unequivocal arguments in favor of eliminating the state from participating in the work of the electricity sector even after the introduction of market principles in its individual segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulia Vymyatnina & Yulia Raskina & Elena Artyukhova & Elena Babkina, 2022. "Market Reforms in Electricity Sector: Pros and Cons," HSE Economic Journal, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 404-428.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2022:3:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ej.hse.ru/en/2022-26-3/782569557.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    electricity sector reforms; demonopolization; competitive markets; public welfare;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L44 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Antitrust Policy and Public Enterprise, Nonprofit Institutions, and Professional Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2022:3:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial board or Editorial board (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.