IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecohse/202115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the TV Show «Sdelka?!»: Prospect Theory Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Dolgikh

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

  • Bogdan Potanin

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

In this paper we test some hypotheses about individual decision making under risk based on the unique Russian TV show «Sdelka?!» participants behavioral data. The show presents the game where participants are supposed to choose between guaranteed amount of money and lottery which may result in gains or losses. Participants are assumed to make decisions based on prospect theory and cumulative prospect theory including both subjective probability trans formation and reference-dependent behavior. Herewith it is assumed that reference point is dynamic so it may change through the game. In order to estimate parameters associated with participants decision making mechanism we propose econometric binary choice model based on quasi maximum likelihood method. The results suggest that contestants adapt reference point depending on the game process. Adaptation seems to be asymmetric since reference point shifts noticeably to the right in response to gains and substantially less to the left if the game goes poorly. In addition, we have found weak evidence in favor of loss aversion effect. In order to demonstrate the robustness of the results we are using various approaches to subjective proba­bilities transformation. According to Akaike information criteria econometric models incorporating probability transformation are superior to objective probability mode.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Dolgikh & Bogdan Potanin, 2021. "Analysis of the TV Show «Sdelka?!»: Prospect Theory Approach," HSE Economic Journal, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 129-146.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2021:1:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ej.hse.ru/en/2021-25-1/450439685.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    decision making under risk; cumulative prospect theory; reference point; optimism; luck;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2021:1:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial board or Editorial board (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.