IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecohse/201826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Forestry Economic Indicators of Russia and Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Petrov

    (Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia)

  • Tatiana Katkova

    (Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia)

  • Sari Karvinen

    (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Joensuu, Finland)

Abstract

Article is devoted to evolution of forest economics of Russia and Finland and problems of increase in effective forest management in Russia. The purpose of work consists in assessment of tendencies of development of the economic relations in forestry formed within national forest laws and the control systems corresponding to them, on the example of two countries: Russia and Finland. The object of research are the economic relations in forestry formed by national control systems and the forest legislation of the explored countries. The subject of research are economic results of administrative activity of forest management structures of Russia and Finland. The research is based on system approach to the problems determined by the work purpose with use of methods of the historical analysis, comparison, modern concepts of steady management, foreign and domestic experience of the economic relations in forestry. Novelty of a research: regularities are revealed and tendencies of development of the forest economics formed on the one hand by supply and demand on forest production and services and, on the other hand, national control systems and the forest legislation of Russia and Finland are estimated. Forest management is considered from the point of view of ecosystem approach. Ranging of degree of the importance of forest ecosystem services in Russia and Finland, proceeding from a contribution to a gross internal product of each service and assessment of the population is carried out. At assessment of efficiency of forest management the material products received from the woods are the basis. An assessment of economic efficiency of forest management in Finland, by comparison of expenses and income of forestry is given. The defining factor in formation of the economic relations in forestry of Finland – the standards of the forest right having pronounced ecological contents, traditions, customs. The regularity of development of the economic relations in forestry of Finland which consists in transition from imperative methods of management to dispositive, granting an option of methods of managing to private forest business is revealed. Negative tendencies in forest management of Russia after the beginning of large-scale administrative reform in the country are analysed. Expenses of the federal budget of the last fifteen years steadily exceed receipts from forest exploitation. In Russia imperative methods of management are based on resource approach, focused on the monetary purposes, don't consider a set of forest ecosystem services. Results of a research can be used by the scientific organizations which are engaged in forecasting of development of branch economies, the forest companies when forming the economic relations in forestry. Researches can be continued in the direction of assessment of forest ecosystem services and their inclusion in the system of the economic relations in forestry at the national and international levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Petrov & Tatiana Katkova & Sari Karvinen, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Forestry Economic Indicators of Russia and Finland," HSE Economic Journal, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 22(2), pages 294-319.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2018:2:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ej.hse.ru/en/2018-22-2/220710549.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnold Kirilovich Tulokhonov & Anna Semynovna Mikheeva & Taisiya Borisovna Bardakhanova, 2020. "Once Again about National Program for Socio-Economic Development of Far East Russia," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 4, pages 165-179.
    2. Anton I. Pyzhev & Roman V. Gordeev & Eugene A. Vaganov, 2020. "Reliability and Integrity of Forest Sector Statistics—A Major Constraint to Effective Forest Policy in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic indicators of forestry; forest exploitation economics; forest management; ecosystem services;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P28 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Natural Resources; Environment
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2018:2:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial board or Editorial board (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.