IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecohse/201743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russian Pension System in the Context of Demographic Challenges and Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Sinyavskaya

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

This work, based on the results of long-term (up to 2050) pension forecasting, is devoted to the study of the impact of demographic parameters on the future of the Russian pay-as-you-go pension system. It assesses the sensitivity of the parameters of the pension system to changing scenarios of the population forecast. It is shown that the scenario with low birth rate, life expectancy and migration leads to the smallest increase in the number of pensioners, but at the same time to the greatest reduction in the number of contributors, which may have negative consequences for the situation on the labor market and economic development in general. On the contrary, the scenario with a high birth rate, high migration and the greatest increase in life expectancy gives the least reduction in the number of contributors, but dramatically increases the number of «insurance» pensioners. From the perspective of fiscal sustainability of the pension system, the «low» scenario is the best, but even there the number of pensioners begins to exceed the number of contributors already in 2024, and the gap between pension contributory incomes and the expenditures on «insurance» pensions increases from 2,4% of GDP in 2017 to 4,6% in 2050. Furthermore, the dynamics of life expectancy in the «low» scenario leaves no room for raising the retirement age. On the basis of statistics and population surveys, the article discusses whether there are socio-demographic reasons for raising the retirement age in Russia and concludes that the significance of the ill health is weakening as an argument against this measure. The article also presents the results of pension forecast performed for one of the possible options for raising the retirement age, which show that this measure significantly reduces the negative consequences of aging, even under the assumptions about a possible increase in unemployment and disability. By 2050, the gap between the pension incomes and expendi tures is almost equal to the level of 2017 under the «high» scenario of the population forecast and still remains 1,3–1,5 times lower for «medium» and «low» scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Sinyavskaya, 2017. "Russian Pension System in the Context of Demographic Challenges and Constraints," HSE Economic Journal, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 21(4), pages 562-591.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2017:4:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ej.hse.ru/en/2017-21-4/213424490.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kapelushnikov, Rostislav (Капелюшников, Ростислав), 2019. "The Phenomenon of Population Aging: Major Economic Effects [Феномен Старения Населения: Экономические Эффекты]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 8-63, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Russian pension system; population ageing; life expectancy; demographic old-age support ratio; old age system support ratio; pension age;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2017:4:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial board or Editorial board (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.