IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hhs/jdaecn/0107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Er Copenhagen Concensus mere interessant end relevant?

Author

Listed:
  • Hansen, Lars Gårn

    (Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet)

  • Møller, Flemming

    (Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Aarhus Universitet)

Abstract

Copenhagen Concensus 2008 er en stort anlagt Cost-Benefit rangordning af mulige løsninger på en række af de store udfordringer, som verden står overfor – klimaproblemer, terror, underernæring med mere. Rangordningen er interessant, fordi den er baseret på et solidt velfærdsøkonomisk grundlag udarbejdet af førende eksperter inden for de enkelte områder, og fordi den afspejler de vurderinger og præferencer, som otte af verdens ledende økonomer (herunder fem nobelpristagere) har kunnet blive enige om bør ligge til grund for den endelige prioritering af indsatsen over for problemerne. Men hvor relevant er den?

Suggested Citation

  • Hansen, Lars Gårn & Møller, Flemming, 2008. "Er Copenhagen Concensus mere interessant end relevant?," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2008(1), pages 178-188.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:jdaecn:0107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.xn--nt-lka.dk/files/2008/2008.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Copenhagen Concensus 2008; Rangordning; Cost Benefit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:jdaecn:0107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lasse Wolsgård (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nffffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.