IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v6y2020i1-2p57-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russia as a Great Power? A Case Study of Southeast Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Espeña & Don McLain Gill

Abstract

The great power concept has been widely used in the study of International Relations. However, its usage has often occurred in foreign policy analyses of a more rhetorical than empirical nature. Several scholars have tried to contribute to defining what a great power is. For the purpose of this study, Andrew Heywood’s great power framework provides a critical understanding of the concept of great powers and touches on the contributions made by other scholars as well. Russia has been usually labeled as a great power based on a common nostalgia of the former Soviet Union and the charisma seen from President Putin; however, before attributing the status of great power to Russia, it is important to look into empirical data, not merely rhetoric. Considering that a great power is global in reach, this paper employs Southeast Asia as a case study in analyzing Russia’s influence in the sub-region. This study claims that despite common perceptions, Russia has not yet achieved great power status based on the empirical data provided against the backdrop of Heywood’s conceptual framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Espeña & Don McLain Gill, 2020. "Russia as a Great Power? A Case Study of Southeast Asia," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 6(1-2), pages 57-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:6:y:2020:i:1-2:p:57-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v06_i1-2_p057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reat power; Russia; Southeast Asia; Andrew Heywood; international relations; Asia-Pacific.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:6:y:2020:i:1-2:p:57-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.