IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gpr/journl/v5y2019i1-2p121-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Border Management: Case Study of Torkhum Border, Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • J. Riaz Hussain

Abstract

The Pakistani government has decided to enforce an effective border management mechanism in 2016 in an attempt to regulate various issues that had remained unregulated for a long period of time due to internal and external factors, such as transboundary ethnic bonds and foreign powers interferences in the region. This paper analyses border management in Torkhum city by assessing its impact on trade, security, and citizen-exchanges. The paper shows that the adoption of the new border management mechanism has not been smooth. The new regulations have led to widespread discontent in the population despite a reduction of incidents of militancy. This study indicates that the growing discontentment among the people dependent on the Torkhum border is condensing into political unity, resulting in greater alliance with the Pakistan Tahaffuz Movement. As a consequence, the influence of the central government is gradually being undermined, as evident from the hostility against the presence of the military in the area. The paper concludes with the view that the border management initiative at Torkham is a prudent and required step, which ought to be studied and developed further.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Riaz Hussain, 2019. "Border Management: Case Study of Torkhum Border, Pakistan," Global Politics Review, Global Politics Review, vol. 5(1-2), pages 121-137.
  • Handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:5:y:2019:i:1-2:p:121-137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v05_i1-2_p121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Border; Pakistan; trade; security; citizens; refugees;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gpr:journl:v:5:y:2019:i:1-2:p:121-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.