IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gmf/journl/y2019i49p4761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Trade and Regulation: Economic and Political Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Bongardt

    (CICP, Universidade de Évora, and Universidade Fernando Pessoa)

  • Francisco Torres

    (Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics and PEFM, Oxford University)

Abstract

The EU’s new generation of deep and comprehensive free trade agreements not only promote EU trade but also have a bearing on the shape of the European model and in consequence on the sustainability of the integration project. They reach much further than conventional free trade agreements. Their benefits hinge on the abolition of non-tariff and regulatory barriers and enter into areas that are member state competences. Much depends on the agreements in question and similarity of preferences between trading partners. It is up to the EU, ultimately for the sake of the sustainability of its political integration project, to explicitly contemplate not only trade impacts but impacts on the Union’s economic model instead of letting rather than being pushed further down the road by unfolding trade dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Bongardt & Francisco Torres, 2019. "EU Trade and Regulation: Economic and Political Dynamics," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 49, pages 47-61, Dezembro.
  • Handle: RePEc:gmf:journl:y:2019:i:49:p:47:61
    DOI: 10.14195/2183-203X_49_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/notaseconomicas/article/view/2183-203X_49_4/5906
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14195/2183-203X_49_4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Comprehensive free trade agreements; EU regulation and preferences; subsidiarity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F68 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Policy
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gmf:journl:y:2019:i:49:p:47:61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sofia Antunes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecucpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.