IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v49y2014i2p79-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South Africa: The 2014 National and Provincial Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Ulf Engel

Abstract

On 7 May 2014, South Africa held its fifth national and provincial elections since the end of apartheid in 1994. Despite a degree of discontent, the ANC remained firmly in power, receiving 62.15 per cent of the vote. Frustration about non-delivery of services, autocratic tendencies within the ruling party and widespread corrupt practices did not translate into substantially more votes for opposition parties, except in the Western Cape and Gauteng regions (and a swing vote from COPE to DA in Northern Cape). However, voter mobilisation seems to be stagnating and ANC breakaway parties are not faring particularly well. Twenty years after the end of apartheid, popular discontent with the ANC government has expressed itself in voting apathy, particularly among the “born-free” generation. Just as in 2004 and 2009, non-voters remain the largest group in the South African electorate, outnumbering even the ANC.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulf Engel, 2014. "South Africa: The 2014 National and Provincial Elections," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 49(2), pages 79-89.
    • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:49:y:2014:i:2:p:79-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/afsp/article/view/755
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Southall, 2005. "The 'Dominant Party Debate' in South Africa," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 40(1), pages 61-82.
    2. Peter Alexander, 2013. "Marikana, turning point in South African history," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(138), pages 605-619, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnard, Helena & Luiz, John M., 2018. "Escape FDI and the dynamics of a cumulative process of institutional misalignment and contestation: Stress, strain and failure," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 605-619.
    2. Powell, E. Erin & Hamann, Ralph & Bitzer, Verena & Baker, Ted, 2018. "Bringing the elephant into the room? Enacting conflict in collective prosocial organizing," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 623-642.
    3. Kishi Roudabeh & Maggio Giuseppe & Raleigh Clionadh, 2017. "Foreign Investment and State Conflicts in Africa," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 23(3), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Engels, Bettina, 2016. "Mining conflicts in sub-Saharan Africa: Actors and repertoires of contention," GLOCON Working Paper Series 2, Freie Universität Berlin, Junior Research Group "Global Change – Local Conflicts?" (GLOCON).
    5. Kehinde O. Omotoso & Jimi O. Adesina & Taiwo F. Gbadegesin, 2020. "Children on the Edge: Estimating Children’s Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty in Post-Apartheid South Africa," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(4), pages 1155-1174, August.
    6. Matthias Basedau & Vita Roy, 2020. "Sleep, bark, or bite: Do natural resources make the difference regarding peaceful or violent conflict?," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 23(1), pages 73-92, March.
    7. Abosede Ijabadeniyi & Frank Vanclay, 2020. "Socially-Tolerated Practices in Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Reporting: Discourses, Displacement, and Impoverishment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Ainara Mancebo, 2021. "Stability and Governability the Benign Effects of Party Dominance in South Africa," Insight on Africa, , vol. 13(1), pages 56-75, January.
    9. Mnwana, Sonwabile & Bowman, Andrew, 2018. "Mine mechanisation and distributional conflict in rural South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 227-237.
    10. Shaik Mahmood Sonday & Anthony Wilson-Prangley, 2018. "Intermediary Capabilities in the Context of Challenging State Dynamics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 667-682, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:49:y:2014:i:2:p:79-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.