IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v39y2004i3p405-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Alles Lügen!" Multiethnische Forschung im Südwesten von Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Oberhofer

Abstract

This paper focuses on the specific research situation in the ethnically and linguistically highly heterogeneous southwest of Burkina Faso. It points out the methodical and empirical implications and limits of multiethnic research. Field work in a multiethnic village is marked by a latent ethnic bias arising for example from the choice of residence and language made by the ethnographer. The author argues that an approach that takes into consideration the perspective of the different ethnic groups can counterbalance those problems. Furthermore, the adoption of a multiethnic approach has advantages in dealing with questions of collective identity. The comparison of self and foreign perceptions of the Phuo - one of the ethnic groups in the southwest of Burkina Faso - reveals the complementary and contrary views about identity and coexistence. Three examples - ritual aspects of land rights, the Dyoro initiation cult and the association as a modern cultural and political resource - show the strategies of selected Phuo for reinforcing their collective identity and boundaries. A new quality in this process of negotiation and boundary drawing is the fixing of formally variable historical events and social conditions in written form, in which the ethnographer becomes equally engaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Oberhofer, 2004. ""Alles Lügen!" Multiethnische Forschung im Südwesten von Burkina Faso," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 39(3), pages 405-426.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:39:y:2004:i:3:p:405-426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:39:y:2004:i:3:p:405-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.