IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3500-d1380416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impacts of Government Subsidies on Public Transportation Customer Complaints: A Case Study of Taichung City Bus Subsidy Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Chun Yen

    (Doctor of Business Administration Degree Program, University of Information Technology and Management, 35225 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Weng Shih Kun Liu

    (Department of International Business, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan)

  • Chuen-Lin Tien

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan)

  • Tian-Jong Hwu

    (Department of Business Management, National United University, Miaoli 36003, Taiwan)

Abstract

The government has implemented an operational subsidy program with the expectation that bus companies can provide better services to passengers. However, does the change in government subsidy policies affect the service levels of bus companies? This study analyzed passenger complaint data to objectively express the results of changes in bus subsidy policies. Taking Taichung City buses as an example, there was a change in transportation policies after a change in the municipal government. Under the old policy, Taichung City buses implemented a subsidy policy based on passengers (SPP), where the first eight kilometers of a route were subsidized. Later, the SPK subsidy policy, based on kilometers (SPK), extended the subsidy coverage by bus mileage to 10 km. This study collected bus passenger complaint data before and after the change in subsidy policies, within six months. A t -Test was conducted to verify if the average customer complaint types were consistent between the two policies. The results showed significant differences in six categories of customer complaints, which were then presented in GIS. Finally, we drew two main conclusions: (1) SPP policy, bus companies focus on operating in CBD; (2) SPK policy, bus companies focus on operating in suburban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Chun Yen & Weng Shih Kun Liu & Chuen-Lin Tien & Tian-Jong Hwu, 2024. "The Impacts of Government Subsidies on Public Transportation Customer Complaints: A Case Study of Taichung City Bus Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3500-:d:1380416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3500-:d:1380416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.