IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3395-d1378190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability Assessment of a Highly Populated Megacity to Ambient Thermal Stress

Author

Listed:
  • Aman Gupta

    (Department of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology (IIEST), Shibpur, Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India)

  • Bhaskar De

    (Department of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology (IIEST), Shibpur, Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India)

  • Anoop Kumar Shukla

    (Manipal School of Architecture and Planning, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India)

  • Gloria Pignatta

    (School of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

The urban ambient environment is directly responsible for the health conditions of millions of people. Comfortable living space is a significant aspect that urban policymakers need to address for sustainable planning. There is still a notable lack of studies that link the spatial profile of urban climate with city-specific built-up settings while assessing the vulnerability of the city population. Geospatial approaches can be beneficial in evaluating patterns of thermal discomfort and strategizing its mitigation. This study attempts to provide a thorough remote sensing framework to analyze the summer magnitude of thermal discomfort for a city in a tropical hot and humid climate. Spatial profiles of dry bulb temperature, wet bulb temperature and relative humidity were prepared for this purpose. A simultaneous assessment of various discomfort indices indicated the presence of moderate to strong heat stress to a vast extent within the study area. The central business district (CBD) of the city indicated a ‘danger’ level of heat disorder for outdoor exposure cases. Nearly 0.69 million people were vulnerable to a moderate threat from humid heat stress, and around 0.21 million citizens faced strong heat stress. Combing city morphology in the study showed that mid-rise buildings had the maximum contribution in terms of thermal discomfort. City areas with built-up cover of more than 68%, along with building height between 5.8 m and 9.3 m, created the worst outdoor discomfort situations. Better land management prospects were also investigated through a multicriteria approach using morphological settlement zones, wind direction, pavement watering, building regulations and future landscaping plans. East–west-aligned road segments of a total 38.44 km length were delineated for water spray cooling and greener pavements. This study is likely to provide solutions for enhancing ambient urban health.

Suggested Citation

  • Aman Gupta & Bhaskar De & Anoop Kumar Shukla & Gloria Pignatta, 2024. "Vulnerability Assessment of a Highly Populated Megacity to Ambient Thermal Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3395-:d:1378190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinlong Yan & Chaohui Yin & Zihao An & Bo Mu & Qian Wen & Yingchao Li & Yali Zhang & Weiqiang Chen & Ling Wang & Yang Song, 2023. "The Influence of Urban Form on Land Surface Temperature: A Comprehensive Investigation from 2D Urban Land Use and 3D Buildings," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3395-:d:1378190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.