IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2293-d1354451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bark Browsing and Recovery: A Comparative Study between Douglas Fir and Silver Fir Species in the Western Carpathians

Author

Listed:
  • Bohdan Konôpka

    (Forest Research Institute Zvolen, National Forest Centre, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia
    Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165000 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Šebeň

    (Forest Research Institute Zvolen, National Forest Centre, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Jozef Pajtík

    (Forest Research Institute Zvolen, National Forest Centre, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia)

Abstract

The foraging behavior of ruminating ungulates significantly impacts forest ecosystems due to their nutritional requirements. This study focuses on inter-specific comparisons of bark browsing (stripping) between Douglas fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and silver fir ( Abies alba Mill.). Field measurements were conducted at the previously established research demonstration site “Husárik” in the Javorníky Mountains, north-western Slovakia. We measured the sizes of wounds on stems and assessed the dimensions of unrecovered parts of wounds, subsequently calculating areas of recovered bark patches. Then, the total areas of wounds recovered patches, and unrecovered parts were measured. Additionally, the percentages of wound areas, recovered areas, and unrecovered areas were expressed as proportions relative to the total bark surface. Influencing factors such as the position of wounds along the vertical stem profile and stem diameter class were analyzed using two- and three-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s LSD test. The results demonstrate the susceptibility of both tree species to bark browsing by ruminating ungulates, primarily red deer ( Cervus elaphus L.) in our study site. Douglas fir exhibited slightly less intense browsing compared to silver fir, while silver fir had a slightly higher recovery rate. Specifically, 17.0% of the bark surface in Douglas fir and 21.5% in silver fir were browsed. The proportions of recovered areas on wounds were 62.5% and 69.6% in Douglas fir and silver fir, respectively. Regarding the vertical stem profile, the most intense browsing occurred at a height of 101–125 cm from the ground level, with rates of 40.7% in Douglas fir and 47.0% in silver fir. Browsing intensity showed negligible variation among diameter classes, which were classified as up to 35 mm, 35–50 mm, and over 50 mm. Our findings suggest that, as an introduced species, Douglas fir is not a suitable substitute for other commercially significant tree species in supporting sustainable forestry in European countries where ruminating ungulates are overabundant.

Suggested Citation

  • Bohdan Konôpka & Vladimír Šebeň & Jozef Pajtík, 2024. "Bark Browsing and Recovery: A Comparative Study between Douglas Fir and Silver Fir Species in the Western Carpathians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2293-:d:1354451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2293-:d:1354451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.