IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1385-d1334672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of the Ecological Environment and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Chushandian Reservoir Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Yichen Fang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Lianhai Cao

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Xinyu Guo

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Tong Liang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Jiyin Wang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Ning Wang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Yue Chao

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

Conducting ecological monitoring assessments and revealing the effects of driving factors are crucial for enhancing ecological safety and promoting sustainable development. Taking the Chushandian Reservoir basin as the research object, this paper employed the Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI), constructed based on remote sensing data, to monitor and assess the ecological environment of the study area from 1990 to 2021, and predicted its future development trend through the Hurst index. On this basis, we integrated land use data to elucidate the response of the ecological environment to human activities. The results show that: (1) The mutation test indicates that selecting 1990, 2004, 2008, 2013, and 2021 as the study time nodes can comprehensively reflect the spatio-temporal information regarding changes in ecological quality in the study area. Specifically, both 1990 and 2021 exhibit higher ecological quality ratings, while 2008 has the lowest ecological quality rating. The spatial distribution of ecological quality is strongly clustered, with high–high clustering and low–low clustering dominating. (2) The overall trend of ecological quality in the study area appears in a pattern of initial decline followed by subsequent improvement. From 1990 to 2004, the degraded area constituted the largest proportion, accounting for 87.82%. After 2008, the quality of the ecological environment began to rebound. Between 2008 and 2013, the proportion of regions with improved ecological conditions was 57.91%, and from 2013 to 2021, 46.74% of the regions showed improvement. (3) In the research area, 36.70% of the regions exhibit a trend of sustainable stability into the future, representing the highest proportion. Approximately 34.3% of the areas demonstrate a trend of sustainable improvement, while the regions exhibiting sustainable degradation account for only 5.72%. While the ecological environment is demonstrating a positive overall developmental trend, it is crucial to stay vigilant regarding areas of ongoing degradation and implement appropriate protective measures. (4) Land use change significantly impacts the ecological environment, with the expansion of land for urban build up causing some ecological deterioration, while the later expansion of forest improves ecological quality. The results provide theoretical approaches and a foundation for decision-making in the ecological management of the Chushandian Reservoir basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Yichen Fang & Lianhai Cao & Xinyu Guo & Tong Liang & Jiyin Wang & Ning Wang & Yue Chao, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of the Ecological Environment and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Chushandian Reservoir Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1385-:d:1334672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuzhen Mao & Jiyun She & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Land Use Change and Eco-Environmental Effects in the Chang-Zhu-Tan Core Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Qiang Liu & Feihong Yu & Xingmin Mu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Ecological Environment Quality of the Kuye River Source Basin Using the Remote Sensing Ecological Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Zhang, Min & Wang, Jinman & Zhang, Yu & Wang, Jin, 2023. "Ecological response of land use change in a large opencast coal mine area of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianwen Zeng & Xiaoai Dai & Wenyu Li & Jipeng Xu & Weile Li & Dongsheng Liu, 2024. "Quantifying the Impact and Importance of Natural, Economic, and Mining Activities on Environmental Quality Using the PIE-Engine Cloud Platform: A Case Study of Seven Typical Mining Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Kai Guo & Zhenhao He & Xiaojin Liang & Xuanwei Chen & Renbo Luo & Tianqi Qiu & Kexin Zhang, 2023. "Examining Relationships between Regional Ecological Risk and Land Use Using the Granger Causality Test Applied to a Mining City, Daye, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Lina Tang & Alimujiang Kasimu & Haitao Ma & Mamattursun Eziz, 2023. "Monitoring Multi-Scale Ecological Change and Its Potential Drivers in the Economic Zone of the Tianshan Mountains’ Northern Slopes, Xinjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1385-:d:1334672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.