IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p701-d1318453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sustainable Approach Using Beef and Pig Bone Waste as a Cement Replacement to Produce Concrete

Author

Listed:
  • Elkin Ronaldo Palomino-Guzmán

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Ibagué, Carrera 22 Calle 67 B/Ambalá, Ibagué 730002, Colombia)

  • Alejandra González-López

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Ibagué, Carrera 22 Calle 67 B/Ambalá, Ibagué 730002, Colombia)

  • Jorge Olmedo-Montoya

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Ibagué, Carrera 22 Calle 67 B/Ambalá, Ibagué 730002, Colombia)

  • Luz Adriana Sanchez-Echeverri

    (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad de Ibagué, Carrera 22 Calle 67 B/Ambalá, Ibagué 730002, Colombia)

  • Nelson Javier Tovar-Perilla

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Departamento de Logística y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Ibagué, Carrera 22 Calle 67 B/Ambalá, Ibagué 730002, Colombia)

Abstract

Owing to the ongoing accumulation of industrial by-products, the management and disposal of waste have emerged as a significant issue. Employing these industrial wastes as an alternative to replace cement holds potential as a promising solution for conserving energy and reducing CO 2 emissions. In this study, pig and beef bone powder were used as cement replacements in concrete, and the mechanical properties were studied. Bone powders were prepared from random bones collected from local slaughterhouses, butchers, and restaurants. The pig bone powder (PBP) and beef bone powder (BBP) were prepared by direct fire contact, oven-calcined for 4 h at 300 °C, crushed, and sieved to size 0.4 to 2 mm. A concrete mix design was formulated for a target compressive strength of 21 MPa at 28 days of curing. This design included three different levels of cement replacement with each type of bone powder (10%, 15%, and 20% by mass). These mixes were then evaluated and compared to a control mix without any bone powder replacement (PB-0). This study evaluated the mechanical properties via compressive strength and flexural testing. The results showed that the workability of the mixtures decreased with the increase in bone powder content. Bone powder functions as a pozzolanic substance, engaging in a chemical reaction with the calcium hydroxide in concrete to produce compounds that exhibit cement-like properties; however, an increase in bone powder content worsened the mechanical properties. The most promising results were obtained for a 10% replacement percentage of BBP and PBP, obtaining strengths of 21.15 MPa and 22.78 MPa, respectively. These are both above the design strength, with PBP concrete even exceeding the strength of PB-0 (21.75 MPa). These results showed a good agreement with the standard values and allow to use these wastes as a replacement for cement, becoming a sustainable solution to the exploitation of quarry materials and, in turn, to the problem of contamination by biological waste from the meat industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Elkin Ronaldo Palomino-Guzmán & Alejandra González-López & Jorge Olmedo-Montoya & Luz Adriana Sanchez-Echeverri & Nelson Javier Tovar-Perilla, 2024. "A Sustainable Approach Using Beef and Pig Bone Waste as a Cement Replacement to Produce Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:701-:d:1318453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:701-:d:1318453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.