IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7442-d1137540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact of the Recycling of Ni-Co-Containing Saggars—A LCA Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zehong Li

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
    Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1, North Second Street, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Zhenhua Sun

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 380 Huaibeizhuang, Huairou District, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Wenbiao Zhang

    (Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, 33 North Fourth Ring Middle Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Shaopeng Li

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 380 Huaibeizhuang, Huairou District, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Scrapped saggars, used for the calcination of the cathode materials of lithium-ion batteries, contain large amounts of nickel, cobalt and manganese compounds, which have high economic value and significance to the ecological environment if recycled. This paper uses the life cycle assessment method to evaluate the environmental impact of the recycling process, compares its impact intensity with that of the direct disposal of Ni-Co-containing saggars and the production of corresponding products with alternative processes, and then compares the impact of each process. Sensitivity analysis of each material input and output item is carried out to find whether the input or output item that has a greater impact on the environment. The results show the following: (1) the environmental impact of the recovery of Ni-Co-containing saggars is much lower than that of equivalent products produced by alternative production methods, and the weighted person equivalent is only 14.5% of the alternative process; (2) from the perspective of processes, the crystallization and leaching processes demonstrate the greatest impact; and (3) among all input and output items, the sulfuric acid input in the reduction and leaching process, the potassium carbonate and steam input in the crystallization process, the potassium carbonate and potassium hydroxide input in the cascade separation process, and the ammonia input in the purification process are the items with the greatest environmental impact, accounting for 86.05% of the overall environmental impact sensitivity and becoming the focus of future process improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Zehong Li & Zhenhua Sun & Wenbiao Zhang & Shaopeng Li, 2023. "Environmental Impact of the Recycling of Ni-Co-Containing Saggars—A LCA Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7442-:d:1137540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Temporelli & Maria Leonor Carvalho & Pierpaolo Girardi, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Electric Vehicle Batteries: An Overview of Recent Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Kirti Richa & Callie W. Babbitt & Gabrielle Gaustad, 2017. "Eco-Efficiency Analysis of a Lithium-Ion Battery Waste Hierarchy Inspired by Circular Economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 715-730, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youssef Amry & Elhoussin Elbouchikhi & Franck Le Gall & Mounir Ghogho & Soumia El Hani, 2022. "Electric Vehicle Traction Drives and Charging Station Power Electronics: Current Status and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Mattia Rapa & Laura Gobbi & Roberto Ruggieri, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Niculina Alexandra Grigore, 2023. "Circular Economy Approaches for Electrical and Conventional Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Briac Baudais & Hamid Ben Ahmed & Gurvan Jodin & Nicolas Degrenne & Stéphane Lefebvre, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of a 150 kW Electronic Power Inverter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    7. Maria Symeonidou & Agis M. Papadopoulos, 2022. "Selection and Dimensioning of Energy Storage Systems for Standalone Communities: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Nora Schelte & Semih Severengiz & Jaron Schünemann & Sebastian Finke & Oskar Bauer & Matthias Metzen, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Electric Moped Scooter Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Gábor Horváth & Attila Bai & Sándor Szegedi & István Lázár & Csongor Máthé & László Huzsvai & Máté Zakar & Zoltán Gabnai & Tamás Tóth, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of the Distinctive Tendencies of the Diffusion of E-Mobility in Central Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.
    10. Aleksandra Wewer & Pinar Bilge & Franz Dietrich, 2021. "Advances of 2nd Life Applications for Lithium Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles Based on Energy Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Lei Zhang & Yingqi Liu & Beibei Pang & Bingxiang Sun & Ari Kokko, 2020. "Second Use Value of China’s New Energy Vehicle Battery: A View Based on Multi-Scenario Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Bing Xia & Suocheng Dong & Yu Li & Zehong Li & Dongqi Sun & Wenbiao Zhang & Wenlong Li, 2021. "Evolution Characters and Influencing Factors of Regional Eco-Efficiency in a Developing Country: Evidence from Mongolia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Armaghan Chizaryfard & Cali Nuur & Paolo Trucco, 2022. "Managing Structural Tensions in the Transition to the Circular Economy: the Case of Electric Vehicle Batteries," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    14. Cris Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano & Yvonne Meer, 2022. "A Theoretical Framework for Circular Processes and Circular Impacts Through a Comprehensive Review of Indicators," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 291-314, June.
    15. Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Marco Raugei & Bernhard Steubing & Anthony Hartwell & Paul A. Anderson & Oliver Heidrich, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling using pyrometallurgical technologies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1560-1571, December.
    16. Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2019. "A Structured Literature Review on Obsolete Electric Vehicles Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Rahil Parag Sheth & Narendra Singh Ranawat & Ayon Chakraborty & Rajesh Prasad Mishra & Manoj Khandelwal, 2023. "The Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Process from a Circular Economy Perspective—A Review and Future Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Surender Reddy Salkuti, 2023. "Advanced Technologies for Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-7, February.
    19. Maria Leonor Carvalho & Andrea Temporelli & Pierpaolo Girardi, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Storage Systems within the Italian Electric Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Phillip K. Agbesi & Rico Ruffino & Marko Hakovirta, 2023. "The development of sustainable electric vehicle business ecosystems," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-59, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7442-:d:1137540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.