IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5763-d1107613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Blinova

    (Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Tatyana Ponomarenko

    (Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Sofiya Tesovskaya

    (Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Many businesses view sustainability issues as important and design corporate sustainability strategies. However, creating such a strategy does not mean the company will progress in sustainable development because the factors influencing businesses remain largely unexplored. Based on a review of studies on corporate sustainability, we identified the major factors affecting any company’s sustainability. They include government regulation, imperfect management, interaction with stakeholders, corporate self-regulation and self-reflection, and the regulatory framework, and can be consolidated into two groups. We also analyzed the groups of methods that can be used to assess a company’s sustainability: traditional corporate sustainability assessment methods, circular economy assessment methods, ESG assessment methods, and non-financial performance indicators. For each group of methods, limitations were identified, and it was concluded that corporate sustainability assessments should factor in the environment in which the company operates. As part of this study, a lack of methods for assessing the corporate sustainability of coal companies was revealed, along with insufficient consideration of industrial factors in the prior literature. These factors are responsible for incorrect corporate sustainability assessments in the coal industry. Taking into account the division of Russian coal companies into three types (energy companies, metal manufacturers, and coal producers) and the aspects of their functioning against the backdrop of economic restrictions (including sanctions and embargoes), the authors prove that each group of companies requires an individual corporate sustainability assessment methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Blinova & Tatyana Ponomarenko & Sofiya Tesovskaya, 2023. "Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5763-:d:1107613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5763/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5763/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2022. "Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Aleksei Kazanin & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2023. "Strategic Priorities for Green Diversification of Oil and Gas Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Diana Dmitrieva & Amina Chanysheva & Victoria Solovyova, 2023. "A Conceptual Model for the Sustainable Development of the Arctic’s Mineral Resources Considering Current Global Trends: Future Scenarios, Key Actors, and Recommendations," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Pavel Tsiglianu & Natalia Romasheva & Artem Nenko, 2023. "Conceptual Management Framework for Oil and Gas Engineering Project Implementation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Oksana Marinina & Anna Nechitailo & Gennady Stroykov & Anna Tsvetkova & Ekaterina Reshneva & Liudmila Turovskaya, 2023. "Technical and Economic Assessment of Energy Efficiency of Electrification of Hydrocarbon Production Facilities in Underdeveloped Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Ekaterina Golovina & Vera Khloponina & Pavel Tsiglianu & Runchu Zhu, 2023. "Organizational, Economic and Regulatory Aspects of Groundwater Resources Extraction by Individuals (Case of the Russian Federation)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Juan Abello-Romero & Claudio Mancilla & Walter Sáez & Francisco Ganga-Contreras & Ivette Durán-Seguel, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Sustainability of Chilean State Universities: Evidence from Their Strategic Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lijuan Zhang & Tatyana Ponomarenko, 2023. "Directions for Sustainable Development of China’s Coal Industry in the Post-Epidemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    2. Yasir Mahmood & Tanzina Afrin & Ying Huang & Nita Yodo, 2023. "Sustainable Development for Oil and Gas Infrastructure from Risk, Reliability, and Resilience Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Amina Andreichyk & Pavel Tsvetkov, 2023. "Study of the Relationship between Economic Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Countries on the Basis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Alina Cherepovitsyna & Nadezhda Sheveleva & Arina Riadinskaia & Konstantin Danilin, 2023. "Decarbonization Measures: A Real Effect or Just a Declaration? An Assessment of Oil and Gas Companies’ Progress towards Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Pavel Tsiglianu & Natalia Romasheva & Artem Nenko, 2023. "Conceptual Management Framework for Oil and Gas Engineering Project Implementation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Tobechukwu Eleogu & Franciscamary Okonkwo & Rosita Eberechukwu Daraojimba & Bukola A. Odulaja & Damilola Emmanuel Ogedengbe & Chioma Ann Udeh, 2024. "Revolutionizing Renewable Energy Workforce Dynamics: HR’s Role in Shaping the Future," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(12), pages 402-422, January.
    7. Natalya Romasheva & Alina Cherepovitsyna, 2023. "Renewable Energy Sources in Decarbonization: The Case of Foreign and Russian Oil and Gas Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5763-:d:1107613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.