IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2653-d1054498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Concern and Awareness of National Parks in China: Evidence from Social Media Big Data and Questionnaire Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yaquan Dou

    (Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Changhao Wu

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Youjun He

    (Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

Abstract

The high quality development of national parks plays an important role in promoting the formation of a reasonable, moderate and orderly land space protection pattern and building a harmonious coexistence of human and nature. However, a lack of public participation has limited the development of high-quality national parks in China. Understanding public concern and awareness of national parks is necessary for promoting greater public participation. This paper provides insight into this problem by combining Weibo and questionnaire survey data, then uses a combination of text mining, a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) theme model, and descriptive statistics to analyze the current state of public concern and awareness of national parks. By analyzing Weibo data, we find: (1) Public concern for national parks is increasing year by year. (2) More economically developed regions may pay more attention to national parks. (3) Public concern for national parks focuses on the construction of national parks in other countries and the institutional reform and ecotourism of national parks in China. Meanwhile, we also find that: (1) Most of the public are willing to actively pay attention to the construction of national parks. (2) The public is not yet fully aware of national parks in China; for example, the number of national parks, their construction, and other issues are still not widely known. (3) Public awareness of the construction goals, functional positioning, and other issues are not generally understood. To sum up, there is still much room for the public to improve their control and awareness of national parks. Finally, we put forward some suggestions to improve the public’s concern with and awareness of national parks, which can promote public participation in their development. This study will be important for sustainable development of the natural reserve system and global biodiversity protection in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaquan Dou & Changhao Wu & Youjun He, 2023. "Public Concern and Awareness of National Parks in China: Evidence from Social Media Big Data and Questionnaire Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2653-:d:1054498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2653/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2653/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesse Sey Ayivor & Johnie Kodjo Nyametso & Sandra Ayivor, 2020. "Protected Area Governance and Its Influence on Local Perceptions, Attitudes and Collaboration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Janetta Nestorová Dická & Alena Gessert & Lenka Bryndzová & Tamás Telbisz, 2020. "Behavioural Survey of Local Inhabitants’ Views and Attitudes about Slovak Karst National Park in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Prasad N. Achyutha & Sushovan Chaudhury & Subhas Chandra Bose & Rajnish Kler & Jyoti Surve & Karthikeyan Kaliyaperumal & Vijay Kumar, 2022. "User Classification and Stock Market-Based Recommendation Engine Based on Machine Learning and Twitter Analysis," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-9, April.
    4. Nikoleta Jones & James McGinlay & Andreas Kontoleon & Victoria A. Maguire-Rajpaul & Panayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos & Vassilis Gkoumas & Jan Åge Riseth & Kalev Sepp & Frank Vanclay, 2022. "Understanding Public Support for European Protected Areas: A Review of the Literature and Proposing a New Approach for Policy Makers," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Tianjun Fu & Ahmed Abbasi & Hsinchun Chen, 2010. "A focused crawler for Dark Web forums," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(6), pages 1213-1231, June.
    6. Sullivan, Abigail & York, Abigail M. & An, Li & Yabiku, Scott T. & Hall, Sharon J., 2017. "How does perception at multiple levels influence collective action in the commons? The case of Mikania micrantha in Chitwan, Nepal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Tianjun Fu & Ahmed Abbasi & Hsinchun Chen, 2010. "A focused crawler for Dark Web forums," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(6), pages 1213-1231, June.
    8. Verónica Iñiguez-Gallardo & Fabián Reyes-Bueno & Olga Peñaranda, 2021. "Conservation Debates: People’s Perceptions and Values towards a Privately Protected Area in Southern Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Sirivongs, Khamfeua & Tsuchiya, Toshiyuki, 2012. "Relationship between local residents' perceptions, attitudes and participation towards national protected areas: A case study of Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area, central Lao PDR," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 92-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oksanen, Atte & Hawdon, James & Räsänen, Pekka, 2014. "Glamorizing rampage online: School shooting fan communities on YouTube," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 55-67.
    2. Gebregziabher, Dawit & Soltani, Arezoo, 2019. "Exclosures in people’s minds: perceptions and attitudes in the Tigray region, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Imran, Sophia & Alam, Khorshed & Beaumont, Narelle, 2014. "Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 290-299.
    4. Dehghani Pour, Milad & Barati, Ali Akbar & Azadi, Hossein & Scheffran, Jürgen & Shirkhani, Mehdi, 2023. "Analyzing forest residents' perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. James McGinlay & Jens Holtvoeth & Alfie Begley & Juliana Dörstel & Anne Kockelmann & Michael Lammertz & Chrysovalantis Malesios & Nikoleta Jones, 2023. "Perceived Social Impacts of Protected Areas, Their Influence on Local Public Support and Their Distribution across Social Groups: Evidence from the Eifel National Park, Germany, during the COVID-19 Pa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Else Ragni Yttredal & Nathalie Homlong, 2020. "Perception of Sustainable Development in a Local World Heritage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Yajun Jiang & Yu Guo & Huiling Zhou, 2023. "Residents’ Perception of Tourism Impact, Participation and Support in Destinations under the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Intermediary Role of Government Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Qiujin Chen & Yuqi Zhang & Yin Zhang & Mingliang Kong, 2022. "Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas: Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Tiantian Tang & Minyan Zhao & Dan Wang & Xiangyu Chen & Wuqiang Chen & Chunwen Xie & Yan Ding, 2022. "Does Environmental Interpretation Impact Public Ecological Flow Experience and Responsible Behavior? A Case Study of Potatso National Park, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Vikram S. Negi & R.K. Maikhuri, 2017. "Forest resources consumption pattern in Govind Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Himalaya, India," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(7), pages 1235-1252, July.
    11. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Živković, Živan, 2017. "Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 11-26.
    12. Ma, Zhao & Clarke, Mysha & Church, Sarah P., 2018. "Insights into individual and cooperative invasive plant management on family forestlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 682-693.
    13. Kokkoris, Ioannis P. & Skuras, Dimitrios & Maniatis, Yannis & Dimopoulos, Panayotis, 2023. "Natura 2000 public awareness in EU: A prerequisite for successful conservation policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    14. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Gintarė Vaznonienė & Bernardas Vaznonis, 2022. "Who Cares for Nature in Rural Areas? Exploration of Relationships between People’s Socio-Economic Characteristics and the Perception of Nature as a Value in Poland and Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Song Lu & Zehui Zhou & Yingfan Lu, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Perceptions, Attitudes, and Environmentally Responsible Behaviors towards Garbage Exchange Supermarkets: An Example from Huangshan City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Mathias, Jean-Denis & Huet, Sylvie & Deffuant, Guillaume, 2017. "An energy-like indicator to assess opinion resilience," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 501-510.
    17. Henri Järv & Raymond D. Ward & Janar Raet & Kalev Sepp, 2021. "Socio-Economic Effects of National Park Governance and Management: Lessons from Post-Socialist Era Estonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-34, November.
    18. Julian Andres Castrillon-Gomez & Gerard Olivar-Tost & Johnny Valencia-Calvo, 2022. "Systems Dynamics and the Analytical Network Process for the Evaluation and Prioritization of Green Projects: Proposal That Involves Participative Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Yurui Li & Xiaofei Qin & Abigail Sullivan & Guangqing Chi & Zhi Lu & Wei Pan & Yansui Liu, 2023. "Collective action improves elite-driven governance in rural development within China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Taboka, Sekgopa Kealeboga, 2016. "Evaluation Of The Impact Of Backyard Gardens On Household Incomes In Southern District, Botswana," Research Theses 265674, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2653-:d:1054498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.