IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2371-d1049304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Modified DANP-mV Model to Explore the Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Jin-Chun Huang

    (School of Business, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China)

  • Jian Wang

    (School of Business, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China)

  • Qiang Nong

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China)

  • Jin-Fei Xu

    (Zhuhai Fudan Innovation Institute, Zhuhai 519000, China)

Abstract

Over the span of three decades, the development of rural tourism has substantially improved rural economies and the lives of rural residents; however, it has also negatively affected societies, cultures, and environments, which is not conducive to sustainable development. Motivated by the aim of meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, the balanced development of economic, social, cultural, and environmental factors in rural tourism can only be achieved by analyzing the current problems of rural tourism on the basis of an overall system. Therefore, this study developed an overall evaluation system for analyzing the sustainable development of rural tourism. This system contains an indicator framework for sustainable development of rural tourism and an analytical mechanism for an improvement strategy constructed using a modified DANP-mV model. In this study, the evaluation system was applied to the empirical case study of Yudong Village in China. The empirical case study results show that social sustainable development ( D 2 ) is not the first priority for improvement, although it exhibits the largest gap. Instead, environmental sustainable development ( D 4 ), which exhibits a smaller gap, should receive higher priority for improvement because it is the root cause of social sustainable development ( D 2 ). The overall improvement strategy for Yudong Village should follow this path: environmental sustainable development ( D 4 ) → social sustainable development ( D 2 ) → economic sustainable development ( D 1 ) → cultural sustainable development ( D 3 ). In addition to demonstrating the effectiveness of the rural tourism sustainable development evaluation system, the empirical case study also demonstrated that the system is capable of identifying the root causes of rural-tourism-related sustainability problems and contributing to the formulation of improvement strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin-Chun Huang & Jian Wang & Qiang Nong & Jin-Fei Xu, 2023. "Using a Modified DANP-mV Model to Explore the Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2371-:d:1049304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi Guo & Jinbo Jiang & Shengchao Li, 2019. "A Sustainable Tourism Policy Research Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2021. "Tourism-led Commodification of Place and Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of Xixinan Village, Huangshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suno Wu, Jenny & Barbrook-Johnson, Pete & Font, Xavier, 2021. "Participatory complexity in tourism policy: Understanding sustainability programmes with participatory systems mapping," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Aboal, Diego & Crespi, Gustavo & Perera, Marcelo, 2020. "How effective are cluster development policies? Evidence from Uruguay," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    3. Yufeng Cheng & Kai Zhu & Quan Zhou & Youssef El Archi & Moaaz Kabil & Bulcsú Remenyik & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Tourism Ecological Efficiency and Sustainable Development in the Hanjiang River Basin: A Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Measure Model Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Ilenia Spadaro & Francesca Pirlone & Fabrizio Bruno & Gianluca Saba & Barbara Poggio & Sabrina Bruzzone, 2023. "Stakeholder Participation in Planning of a Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Destination: The Genoa Integrated Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    5. Yao Chang & Dongbing Li & Zibibula Simayi & Yiwei Ren & Shengtian Yang, 2022. "Spatial Distribution of Leisure Agriculture in Xinjiang and Its Influencing Factors Based on Geographically Weighted Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Wookhyun An & Silverio Alarcón, 2020. "How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Woohyun Yoo & Taemin Kim & Soobum Lee, 2021. "Predictors of Viewing YouTube Videos on Incheon Chinatown Tourism in South Korea: Engagement and Network Structure Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-11, November.
    8. Chen Wei & Guoquan Zheng, 2023. "Measuring and Evaluating the Commodification of Sustainable Rural Living Areas in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Luis Miguel López-Bonilla & María del Carmen Reyes-Rodríguez & Jesús Manuel López-Bonilla, 2020. "Golf Tourism and Sustainability: Content Analysis and Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Asyma Koshim & Aigul Sergeyeva & Yerkin Kakimzhanov & Aliya Aktymbayeva & Mereke Sakypbek & Akmaral Sapiyeva, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Ecotourism in “Altynemel” National Park, Kazakhstan: Assessment through the Perception of Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Yuetao Yang & Gowhar Ahmad Wani & V. Nagaraj & Mohammad Haseeb & Sameer Sultan & Md. Emran Hossain & Mustafa Kamal & Syed Mehmood Raza Shah, 2023. "Progress in Sustainable Tourism Research: An Analysis of the Comprehensive Literature and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Panasiuk Aleksander, 2020. "Policy of Sustainable Development of Urban Tourism," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 27(2), pages 33-37, June.
    13. Thomas Bausch & Tilman Schröder & Verena Tauber & Bernard Lane, 2021. "Sustainable Tourism: The Elephant in the Room," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Emanuele Giorgi & Tiziano Cattaneo & Minqing Ni & Renata Enríquez Alatriste, 2020. "Sustainability and Effectiveness of Chinese Outline for National Tourism and Leisure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, February.
    15. Ivan Paunović & Marc Dressler & Tatjana Mamula Nikolić & Sanja Popović Pantić, 2020. "Developing a Competitive and Sustainable Destination of the Future: Clusters and Predictors of Successful National-Level Destination Governance across Destination Life-Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Xiaomin Sun & Jing Qing & Syed Ahsan Ali Shah & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2023. "Exploring the Complex Nexus between Sustainable Development and Green Tourism through Advanced GMM Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Huixin Gong & Yaomin Zheng & Jinlian Shi & Jiaxin Wang & Huize Yang & Sinead Praise A. Sibalo & Amani Mwamlima & Jingyu Li & Shuting Xu & Dandan Xu & Xiankai Huang, 2023. "An Examination of the Spatial Spillover Effects of Tourism Transportation on Sustainable Development from a Multiple-Indicator Cross-Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Aurora Skrame & Claudio Ciancio & Vincenzo Corvello & Roberto Musmanno, 2020. "A Quantitative Model Supporting Socially Responsible Public Investment Decisions for Sustainable Tourism," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, June.
    19. Lin Fu & Junko Sanada, 2023. "Spatial Patterns and Influencing Factors of Rural Land Commodification at Township Scale: A Case Study in Shijiazhuang City, North China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Ledi Wen & Lei Sima, 2022. "Analysis of Outdoor Activity Space-Use Preferences in Rural Communities: An Example from Puxiu and Yuanyi Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2371-:d:1049304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.