IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16926-d1302064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of the Decision to Select Renovated Elements in a Heritage Building on Further Stages of the Aging Process of the Building—A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Kurowska

    (Doctoral School of Exact and Technical Sciences, Institute of Civil Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, 65-516 Zielona Góra, Poland)

  • Beata Nowogońska

    (Institute of Civil Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, 65-516 Zielona Góra, Poland)

Abstract

The successful use of buildings requires experience, interdisciplinary knowledge and skills. Wrong decisions made by building owners or managers to implement repair projects have a negative impact on the aging of buildings, which is closely related to sustainable development. Renovation projects in more degraded buildings must be carried out to a greater extent, which has a negative impact on the environment in the form of more building waste. This article presents the results of research on the impact of refurbishment decisions on the technical conditions of buildings. The development of an optimal building renovation strategy will result in a safe and comfortable building. A comparative analysis of the impact of the choice of repair building elements on further aging changes in the building was carried out. The reason for the subject is the frequent consideration by managers of the hierarchy of building elements that improve the technical condition of the building, the reason for which is the lack of financial resources to carry out overall renovation works. To date, two refurbishment strategies have been adopted, as well as assumptions about the building’s material and structural solutions and the building’s service life. Theoretical assumptions were applied to determine the repair needs of the Bialkow palace. The method shows the superiority of the impact of structural elements over non-structural elements in improving the technical condition of a building. Developing a renovation plan with the implementation of the presented strategy will significantly reduce the technical condition of the entire building with a moderate budget, limiting the occurrence of a building disaster and the serious carbon footprint associated with the demolition of the property.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Kurowska & Beata Nowogońska, 2023. "Influence of the Decision to Select Renovated Elements in a Heritage Building on Further Stages of the Aging Process of the Building—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16926-:d:1302064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessandra Oppio, 2019. "Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateusz Naramski & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Configuring a Trust-based Inter-organizational Cooperation Network for Post-industrial Tourist Organizations on a Tourist Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Classification of Heritage Residential Building Stock and Defining Sustainable Retrofitting Scenarios in Khedivial Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Magdalena Roszczynska-Kurasinska & Anna Domaradzka & Anna Wnuk & Tomasz Oleksy, 2021. "Intrinsic Value and Perceived Essentialism of Culture Heritage Sites as Tools for Planning Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Jinghua Song & Junyang Chen & Xiu Yang & Yuyi Zhu, 2024. "Research on Adaptive Reuse Strategy of Industrial Heritage Based on the Method of Social Network," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Stefano Capolongo & Leopoldo Sdino & Marta Dell’Ovo & Rossella Moioli & Stefano Della Torre, 2019. "How to Assess Urban Regeneration Proposals by Considering Conflicting Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Carlos J. Pardo Abad, 2020. "Valuation of Industrial Heritage in Terms of Sustainability: Some Cases of Tourist Reference in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Oluwatobi Mary Owojori & Chioma Sylvia Okoro & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Current Status and Emerging Trends on the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Marco Rossitti & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Financial Sustainability of Cultural Heritage Reuse Projects: An Integrated Approach for the Historical Rural Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Zhengyuan Zhao & Zhigao Liu, 2021. "Development Path of Industrial Heritage Tourism: A Case Study of Kitakyushu (Japan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Bottero Marta & Datola Giulia, 2020. "Addressing Social Sustainability in Urban Regeneration Processes. An Application of the Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Marko Nikolić & Boško Drobnjak & Irena Kuletin Ćulafić, 2020. "The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of Industrial Heritage: The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-36, June.
    12. Marta Bottero & Giulia Datola & Daniele Fazzari & Roberta Ingaramo, 2022. "Re-Thinking Detroit: A Multicriteria-Based Approach for Adaptive Reuse for the Corktown District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Rui Han & Shiqi Yang, 2023. "A Study on Industrial Heritage Renewal Strategy Based on Hybrid Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.
    14. Marta Bottero & Caterina Caprioli & Giancarlo Cotella & Marco Santangelo, 2019. "Sustainable Cities: A Reflection on Potentialities and Limits based on Existing Eco-Districts in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Miloš Aranđelović & Aleksandar Videnović & Nebojša Gadžić & Dušan Tomanović, 2022. "Repurposing and the Impact of New Facilities on the Potential Presentation of Industrial Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Giovanna Acampa & Fabrizio Battisti & Mariolina Grasso, 2023. "An Evaluation System to Optimize the Management of Interventions in the Historic Center of Florence World Heritage Site: From Building Preservation to Block Refurbishment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessia Marello, 2020. "An Application of the A’WOT Analysis for the Management of Cultural Heritage Assets: The Case of the Historical Farmhouses in the Aglié Castle (Turin)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Ines Grigorescu & Cristina Dumitrică & Monica Dumitrașcu & Bianca Mitrică & Costin Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Urban Development and the (Re)use of the Communist-Built Industrial and Agricultural Sites after 1990. The Showcase of Bucharest–Ilfov Development Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Qi Duan & Lihui Qi & Renyu Cao & Peng Si, 2022. "Research on Sustainable Reuse of Urban Ruins Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology: A Study of Guangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-28, November.
    20. Berkan Kahvecioğlu & Semra Arslan Selçuk, 2023. "Adaptive Reuse in the Realm of Architecture: Global Research Trends and Gaps for the Future Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16926-:d:1302064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.