IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16409-d1290424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residual Stand Structure and Topography Predict Initial Survival and Animal Browsing of Redwood and Douglas-Fir Seedlings Planted in Coastal Forests of Northern California

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt A. Schneider

    (Department of Forestry, Fire, and Rangeland Management, California Polytechnic State University, Humboldt, 1 Harpst St., Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • John-Pascal Berrill

    (Department of Forestry, Fire, and Rangeland Management, California Polytechnic State University, Humboldt, 1 Harpst St., Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Christa M. Dagley

    (Department of Forestry, Fire, and Rangeland Management, California Polytechnic State University, Humboldt, 1 Harpst St., Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Lynn A. Webb

    (Jackson Demonstration State Forest, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, 802 North Main St., Fort Bragg, CA 95437, USA)

  • Aaron Hohl

    (Department of Forestry, Fire, and Rangeland Management, California Polytechnic State University, Humboldt, 1 Harpst St., Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

Abstract

Successful regeneration of commercial species is central to the long-term sustainability of forests managed for wood production. We studied two species of tree seedlings planted after group selection and single-tree selection harvesting in a 20 ha replicated silviculture experiment in stands dominated by coast redwood ( Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) Endl.). Treatments consisted of complete harvest in 1 ha group selection opening (GS), low-density dispersed retention (LD), aggregated high-density retention (HA), and dispersed high-density retention (HD). One year after planting, seedlings planted on a southwest aspect had the lowest survival rate, while northeast aspects had nearly complete survival rates. As expected, redwood had a higher survival rate than coast Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii var menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Survival rates exhibited a rise-peak-fall pattern with stand density, most notably on southwest-facing slopes, ranking LD > HA ≈ HD > GS treatments. Deer browsing of planted seedlings was a pervasive problem where Douglas-fir were preferentially browsed over redwood. In treatments with higher retention densities, browsing was less likely, ranking GS > LD > HA > HD treatments. Further from watercourses at higher elevation, the probability of browsing diminished. Overall, dispersed treatments outperformed aggregated and GS treatments by simultaneously maximizing survival and minimizing browsing of planted seedlings. We did not perform site preparation or herbicide treatment of re-sprouting hardwoods following harvest, and therefore recommend testing the effectiveness of understory vegetation management to enhance seedling survival. Consideration could also be given to planting more seedlings in anticipation of lower survival rates, and/or implementing seedling protection measures when and where heavy browsing is expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt A. Schneider & John-Pascal Berrill & Christa M. Dagley & Lynn A. Webb & Aaron Hohl, 2023. "Residual Stand Structure and Topography Predict Initial Survival and Animal Browsing of Redwood and Douglas-Fir Seedlings Planted in Coastal Forests of Northern California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16409-:d:1290424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16409-:d:1290424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.