IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p16027-d1281831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inland Waterway Infrastructure Maintenance Prediction Model Based on Network-Level Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    School of Civil Architectural and Engineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China)

  • Pingyi Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Huaihan Liu

    (Changjiang Waterway Bureau, Wuhan 430010, China)

  • Bin Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Jianle Sun

    (Information Center, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China)

  • Jian Li

    (Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

Abstract

Maintenance decision optimization based on network-level assessment has a long history in road transportation infrastructure and has greatly assisted management departments in saving in expenditure on maintenance costs. However, its application and research in water transportation infrastructure have been lacking. This paper aims to design a predictive model for waterway improvement building maintenance based on network-level assessment and provide a new solution for optimizing the allocation of limited maintenance funds for inland waterway infrastructure. The proposed network-level assessment framework and predictive model comprise data collection, maintenance prediction, and maintenance decision modules. A small time-series dataset was constructed based on the classification proportions of improvement building technical conditions in the jurisdiction of the Yangtze River trunk waterway over the past five years. The two-parameter moving average method was transformed into a single-parameter “jurisdiction moving average method” to suit the characteristics of the dataset. Three models, namely the jurisdiction moving average (JMA), the linear regression (LR), and the quadratic curve regression (QCR) models, were employed to perform calculations on the dataset, which were evaluated using t -tests and error analysis. The research results indicated that both the JMA and LR models showed good overall performance and were recommended for use. Especially, the confidence intervals of the JMA model increased the credibility of the prediction results, making it the ideal choice. This study also found that the inland waterway maintenance prediction technology based on the network-level evaluation has higher overall efficiency than the known existing technologies. The proposed predictive model allows for a simple and rapid assessment of the overall risk status of regional waterway facilities and is easy to promote and apply.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Zhang & Pingyi Wang & Huaihan Liu & Bin Zhang & Jianle Sun & Jian Li, 2023. "Inland Waterway Infrastructure Maintenance Prediction Model Based on Network-Level Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16027-:d:1281831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bocchini, Paolo & Frangopol, Dan M., 2011. "A probabilistic computational framework for bridge network optimal maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 332-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. Nogal, M. & Honfi, D., 2019. "Assessment of road traffic resilience assuming stochastic user behaviour," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 72-83.
    3. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    4. Tong Wang & Yang Liu & Qiyuan Li & Peng Du & Xiaogong Zheng & Qingfei Gao, 2023. "State-of-the-Art Review of the Resilience of Urban Bridge Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G., 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning driven inspection and maintenance planning under incomplete information and constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G., 2019. "Managing engineering systems with large state and action spaces through deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Okasha, Nader M. & Frangopol, Dan M. & Orcesi, André D., 2012. "Automated finite element updating using strain data for the lifetime reliability assessment of bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 139-150.
    8. Klerk, Wouter Jan & Kanning, Wim & Kok, Matthijs & Wolfert, Rogier, 2021. "Optimal planning of flood defence system reinforcements using a greedy search algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Iannacone, Leandro & Sharma, Neetesh & Tabandeh, Armin & Gardoni, Paolo, 2022. "Modeling Time-varying Reliability and Resilience of Deteriorating Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Calvert, Gareth & Neves, Luis & Andrews, John & Hamer, Matthew, 2020. "Multi-defect modelling of bridge deterioration using truncated inspection records," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16027-:d:1281831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.